Post Your Guide Service FREE
Our Sponsors and Partners:
  • Facebook Badge
  • Texas Land Bank Special
  • Google Adsense 120x600 Skyscraper
  • Advertise Here
  • Sticker Giveaway - Classic
Monthly Points Leaders
  1. LSmith6749 (2235)
  2. wohalliburton (1608)
  3. scott dye (1506)
  4. S&W outfitters (952)
  5. Hunter X (854)
  6. cphalsell (800)
  7. Hardy (705)
  8. twf143 (675)
  9. qualityhuntcon... (666)
  10. wyleecoyotetx (617)
Yearly Points Leaders
  1. wohalliburton (42628)
  2. LSmith6749 (38045)
  3. scott dye (19674)
  4. Hunter X (8890)
  5. wheeless621 (7338)
  6. shasto (7293)
  7. kenjayne (6419)
  8. Hardy (4505)
  9. Benson Farm an... (4298)
  10. S&W outfitters (3934)
Google Adsense 300x250 Medium Rectangle

The Deer Genetics Management Debate

       
Click a star to rate this entry rate this entry with 1 starsrate this entry with 2 starsrate this entry with 3 starsrate this entry with 4 starsrate this entry with 5 stars Average user rating: 4.11 (of 9 total)

A common topic among landowners is whitetail gene pool management.   When talking about the management of a deer herd’s genetics there are basically two schools of thought.  One is the genetics management strategy developed and championed by TPWD and their research station on the Kerr wildlife management area.   This strategy, based on half a century of controlled environment research (their only test subjects have been deer who literally spend their entire lives in a small pin), emphasizes the importance of killing all spikes- no matter what.  Their reasoning for killing spikes stems from research showing that if two deer are born in the same year and one is a spike and the other is a 4 point the spike will always be inferior to the 4 point, which is true, with pin raised deer. 

 

The other school of thought comes from one of the, no, the greatest deer manager of all time, Al Brothers.  In a time when deer populations were managed like cattle and shooting does was thought to be a cardinal sin, Mr. Brothers applied his real world experiences from the field and co-authored a book called, Producing Quality White-tails, changing the way we look at deer management today.  His management strategy was based on 3 principals: letting bucks grow old, planting food plots, and keeping buck doe ratios as close to 1:1 as possible.   What Mr. Brothers strategy has over the archaic dogma that TPWD is now using to set harvest regulations in parts of Texas, is that his strategy can actually be applied by ranchers, hunters, and deer managers to create deer populations with more bucks and bigger racks.  Until the day that deer walk out from the woods with their age, weight, and a record of what they have been eating and will eat in future seasons tattooed on their backs, the indiscriminate killing of young deer, thought to be inferior, is not practical for managing deer genetics, unless of course these deer live their entire lives in a variable controlled pin, living off an ample ration of pedigree.  If you are managing an average Texas lease, between hunter error and environmental variation, there are just too many variables too implore the Kerr WMA’s harvest strategy on your ranch. 

 

 I could go on about this debate for days and actually have interviewed Mr. Brothers and the staff of the Kerr wildlilfe management area on this topic, but I’ll save some of my rant, maybe for a full length article to be posted on the wildlife resources section of texashuntfish.com.  If you guys have any interest in this topic or would like to suggest another topic for a feature length article let me know.

 

By John Schwarzlose of Texas Wildlife Unlimited

Comments:

Author:hornsfan Comment Left:01/19/2007 12:16
This is a very serious topic, and I would love to hear more.  I plan on purchising Producing Quality White-tails  by Al Brothers because I want to know more.  This is where we all stand to learn more.  Its not just about filling feeders and shooting the first buck that comes out.  I myself try to 1. not shoot smaller than what I already have on the wall, and 2nd learn as much about ageing as possible. Thank you.
Author:Doe eyes Comment Left:01/23/2007 16:31

My boyfriend has been hunting private land in Fayetteville for 15 years now.  He has noticed a nice increase in quality deer due to antler restrictions.  I think we only saw one spike the whole season and we were out there every weekend.  We didn't get a shoot off cause my boyfriend says to me look there is a doe get the binoculars.  When I looked I said to him that doe has horns lol.  By that time he was almost into the woods.

Author:a1mullins Comment Left:09/10/2009 20:30

I have also seen a dramatic increase in the quality of bucks on my property in East Texas since TPWD has implemented an antler restriction program. If we can hold off shooting a nice 3.5 year old we will have a better 4.5 year old and if he survives to be 5 WOW! Not to mention the extra years that he is allowed to walk he is continuing to spread his genetic potential.

Author:wohalliburton Comment Left:09/17/2009 12:19

I think this topic will be kicked around for a long time.  TPWD's research is based on a limited number of samples, and just like with a number of research topics, the results must be weighed in that light.  Do I think that what TPWD does works?  Yes, in many cases.  Is there a better way?  Perhaps.  But, there are shortcomings in both management techniques. 

With TPWD's, its pretty easy to make somewhat of an analogy between young bucks and children.  Some develop more slowly then others.  There's been much research that proves spikes don't always stay spikes...sometimes they grow tremendous 8-to-10 point racks after as long as 3.5-4.5 YO.  From what i understand with Al Brother's (I have not read his book yet) it makes the assumption that a spike buck does not breed until he reaches the point a game manager can determine whether he needs to be culled.  Even in areas with low buck-to-doe ratios the dominant buck is not always the one that does the breeding. 

Maybe this is too simplistic, but to me both systems have their merits:  Al Brother's in that it focuses on food sources, population control, and age structure.  But TPWD's also has merit in that shooting 'inferior' spike bucks will minimize that genetic trait from the herd so that the bucks that are not culled will have a much lower tendency to that trait.

Author:sureshot Comment Left:10/04/2009 07:05

I myself beleive that a young spike deer should get the chance to get some age on him. The reason I say this that you dont know what you are killing yet, that deer could turn into the biggest buck you have ever seen. Now if you see an older deer with spike horns you better kill him because you may never see him again.