Our Sponsors and Partners:
|
SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 26, 2009 09:57 AM
[#1]
|
flounder
Points:
Y (1)
/
M (1)
|
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 10:06 AM
Subject: HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
Greetings Texas Hunters,
THIS is a very important bill. I know most officials in Texas could not say CWD (would not for fear of someone talking about it), but this is really what this bill is all about. Several states have introduced CWD into their state by Taxidermist, from what the investigations have concluded. SO i would suggest that every hunter out there push for this bill to pass. YOU DO NOT WANT CWD BROUGHT INTO TEXAS, if it is not here already here, and they are going to have to do a lot more testing around NEW MEXICO WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE Texas border, and do more testing in the game farms in TEXAS to convince me of that.
Please see bill, and then CWD Taxidermy data i put together a while back. ...terry
By: AA Homer H.B.ANo.A4214
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTIONA1.AATitle 5, Parks and Wildlife Code, is amended by adding Subtitle C-1 to read as follows:
SUBTITLE C-1. TAXIDERMY
CHAPTER 73. TAXIDERMY
SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec.A73.001.AADEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
(1)AA"Animal" means any species of wild or exotic animal, including any bird or fish, the taking, possession, or sale of which is regulated by this code or a rule adopted under this code. (2)AA"Exotic animal" has the meaning assigned by Section 62.015. (3)AA"Game animal" has the meaning assigned by Section 63.001. (4)AA"Game bird" has the meaning assigned by Section 64.001. (5)AA"Migratory game bird" has the meaning assigned by Section 64.021. (6)AA"Specimen" means all or any part of an animal, including the skin or hide. (7)AA"Tanner" means a person who prepares green or
81R4378 SLB-F 1
untanned hides, capes, or skins. (8)AA"Taxidermist" means a person who is engaged in the business of taxidermy. (9)AA"Taxidermist employee" means a person who is employed by a taxidermist, performs taxidermy under the direction of another taxidermist, and does not perform taxidermy for the public. (10)AA"Taxidermy" means the art of preparing the skin, feathers, or other parts of an animal in a preserved state, often for display, including: (A)AAtanning the hides, capes, or skins; or (B)AAmounting the preserved parts of a specimen, including the skull, antlers, or horns. Sec.A73.002.AAPERMIT REQUIRED; EXCEPTIONS. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (c), a person, including a tanner, may not engage in the business of taxidermy unless the person has a taxidermy permit issued by the department. (b)AAA taxidermist shall prominently display the taxidermy permit in the place where the taxidermist performs taxidermy. (c)AAA taxidermy permit is not required for: (1)AAa taxidermist employee if the taxidermist supervises the employee ’s work; or (2)AAa tanner performing work for a taxidermist. Sec.A73.003.AAISSUANCE OF PERMIT; EXPIRATION; FEES. (a) The department shall issue a taxidermy permit to a person who submits a completed application as prescribed by the department subject to conditions set by the commission.
H.B.ANo.A4214
2
(b)AAA taxidermy permit is valid from September 1 or another date set by the commission, through August 31 of the next year or another date set by the commission. (c)AAThe fee for a taxidermy permit is $50, or an amount set by the commission, whichever amount is greater. Sec.A73.004.AARULES. The commission may adopt rules to implement this chapter, including rules governing the denial of an application to obtain or renew a taxidermy permit. [Sections 73.005-73.020 reserved for expansion] SUBCHAPTER B. PRIVILEGES AND DUTIES OF PERMIT HOLDER Sec.A73.021.AARECORDS REQUIRED. (a) A taxidermy permit holder shall maintain an accurate book or electronic record containing: (1)AAthe number of specimens received in a lot; (2)AAthe date the lot is received by the permit holder; (3)AAfor each specimen, the specimen type; (4)AAfor the person who killed or caught the specimen: (A)AAthe person ’s name, address, and telephone number; and (B)AAthe person ’s hunting or fishing license number, driver ’s license number, or Department of Public Safety identification card number; and (5)AAfor the person who delivered the specimen to the permit holder, if that person is not the person who killed or caught the specimen: (A)AAthe person ’s name, address, and telephone number; and
H.B.ANo.A4214
3
(B)AAthe person ’s hunting or fishing license number, driver ’s license number, or Department of Public Safety identification card number. (b)AAThe hunting license tag, wildlife resource document, or permit must remain with the specimen until the specimen is released from the permit holder ’s possession. (c)AAIf a portion of the specimen is given to a taxidermy employee or a tanner to perform work for the permit holder, the taxidermy employee or tanner shall maintain a record of: (1)AAthe taxidermy permit number of the supervising permit holder and a work order number for the specimen; or (2)AAa bill of sale from a lawful source. (d)AAExcept as provided by commission rule, a taxidermist or a taxidermy employee or tanner who is not required to hold a permit under this chapter shall maintain the records required by this section until the second anniversary of the date on which a specimen is released from possession by the taxidermist, taxidermist employee, or tanner. Sec.A73.022.AASALE OF UNCLAIMED SPECIMENS. (a) Except as provided by this section, if the owner of a lawfully taken specimen that has been mounted or tanned has not claimed the specimen on or before the 60th day after the date of receiving notification that the taxidermy or tanning is complete, the taxidermist may sell the specimen. (b)AANotification under this section must be by registered or certified mail. (c)AAThe taxidermy permit holder shall maintain records as
H.B.ANo.A4214
4
required by Section 73.021 for a specimen sold under this section. (d)AAExcept as provided by Subsections (e) and (f), a taxidermy permit holder may sell an unclaimed game animal, bird, or fish specimen for an amount not to exceed the cost of taxidermy materials and labor related to the specimen. This restriction does not apply to an unclaimed deer specimen. (e)AAA taxidermy permit holder may sell an unclaimed game animal skin or hide only to a person holding a taxidermy permit. The restriction on the sale of an unclaimed skin or hide does not apply to an unclaimed deer skin or hide. The origin of any skin or hide sold under this section must be documented. (f)AAA taxidermy permit holder may not sell an unclaimed specimen of a migratory game bird or nongame bird. (g)AASection 62.021 does not apply to the sale of a specimen under this section. Sec.A73.023.AAPOSSESSION OF SPECIMENS ACQUIRED OUTSIDE THIS STATE. A taxidermy permit holder may possess a specimen lawfully acquired outside this state only if the specimen is accompanied by a bill of sale and any required permit, including a permit issued under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. [Sections 73.024-73.040 reserved for expansion] SUBCHAPTER C. ENFORCEMENT Sec.A73.041.AAPENALTY. (a) A person commits an offense if the person violates any provision of this chapter or a rule adopted under this chapter. (b)AAExcept as provided by Subsection (c), an offense under
H.B.ANo.A4214
5
this chapter is a Class C Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor. (c)AAIf it is shown at the trial of the defendant for a violation of this chapter or a rule adopted under this chapter that the defendant has been convicted one or more times before the trial date of a violation of this chapter or a rule adopted under this chapter, the offense is a Class B Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor.
SECTIONA2.AAEffective June 1, 2010, Section 62.023, Parks and Wildlife Code, is repealed. SECTIONA3.AAThe Parks and Wildlife Commission shall adopt rules and procedures, including any fees or forms related to a taxidermy permit, required to implement Chapter 73, Parks and Wildlife Code, as added by this Act, not later than April 1, 2010. SECTIONA4.AA(a) Except as provided by Subsection (b) of this section, this Act takes effect September 1, 2009. (b)AASections 73.002 and 73.041, Parks and Wildlife Code, as added by this Act, take effect June 1, 2010.
H.B.ANo.A4214
6
HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
CWD to tighten taxidermy rules Hunters need to understand regulations
The movement of high-risk carcass parts (brain, spinal cord, lymph tissues) is a potential avenue through which CWD could be spread from infected areas. Investigations in New York indicate that the infection could have been spread by a taxidermist who accepted specimens from CWD-positive states, allowed rehabilitated fawns access to the taxidermy workshop and spread potentially infectious curing salt waste as a fence line weed killer on his deer farm.
for anyone interested in full text ;
Thursday, March 26, 2009
HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
kind regards,
terry
|
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 26, 2009 11:33 AM
[#2]
|
weaver

Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
no the bill needs more work. its not the taxidermist that need the permit. game traders,deer processer and deer farms should
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 26, 2009 01:56 PM
[#3]
|
murphy1961

Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
I'm getting tired of seeing this guy's cut and paste posts relating to CWD. Googled his name and this is one of first things to pop up:
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/article_detail.cfm/article/138
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 26, 2009 01:58 PM
[#4]
|
Hardy

Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
Starr county
|
Nope.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 26, 2009 02:01 PM
[#5]
|
Hardy

Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
Starr county
|
This is what Ken linked to. I think it's important to have this info. As I stated in earlier posts, this is usually "agenda driven", not fact driven.
I rest my case.
Once again Terry, I am incredibly sorry for your loss and in no way do I make light of it. But this unfortunately speaks for itself.
"Terry Singletary -- A retired machinist and high school dropout, Terry Singletary suffered the tragic loss of his mother to “sporadic” Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) in 1997. Desperate to find an explanation for his mother’s death, he has devoted himself to the sad and fruitless task of connecting her death to her diet. Various reports confirm that Mrs. Singletary’s life was claimed by the most common sub-type of CJD (one that accounts for 70 percent of “sporadic” cases). Sporadic CJD, unlike its newer “variant,” is not linked to meat.
As the self-appointed international coordinator of CJD Watch, an organization he co-founded with social worker Deborah Oney, Singletary is cited in media reports as an apparent expert on tracking mad cow disease. This despite his lack of formal education and the absence for support from any credible academic, medical or scientific authority. His sensationalist allegations about the safety of U.S. beef have found their way into hundreds of newspapers and broadcasts. Singletary moderates a mad-cow discussion forum run by a vegetarian activist group; his contributions account for more than half the traffic on the “BSE-L” mailing list, which is generally read by real scientists. Animal rights activists and other food-scare artists frequently refer to him as “Dr. Terry Singletary,” apparently an honorary degree as he has yet to finish high school.
Like many activists, Singletary ignores overwhelming epidemiological and laboratory evidence that rules out a connection between sporadic CJD and beef. Relying entirely on shallow circumstantial evidence and frequent repetition of claims which have been publicly refuted as false, he also blindly insists upon a mad-cow with Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and Lou Gehrig’s disease. His specific allegations have been clearly refuted by Centers for Disease Countrol and Prevention scientists in the journal Neurology. "
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 26, 2009 04:53 PM
[#6]
|
lostpinestaxidermy
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
First off Terry, there is no proof about CWD being related to any human deaths that I know of and you are not reading the bill they are proposing, furthermore Texas is a right to make a living state and if you are not in the PROFESSION, not hobby then you are not understanding the bill. Word is this is someone who complained to TPWD about some taxidermist that closed his doors and run off with the money and animals. Well if this is true then In any business there is crooks and that bill is not going to fix that. Most people that get screwed is people that looks for the cheapest price,not that anything is wrong with that it is human nature to try and get the best price you can but if you did some researce on the taxidermist you can find out alot. most of the time you get what you pay for. I donT know why people want to blame someone that does not have anything to do with CWD and can say vote for this bill when they are not even reading the thing. In my mind you are being" Close Minded."If you or anyone wants info on CWD then I will give you Dr. Dan McBrides number which he can answer any and all questions pretaining to CWD. Anyway Terry you must not hunt. If you do and you kill something what do you do with it? Throw it away, donate it to the needy? Well if you do the first you are breaking the law, if you do the second you are infecting all the needy according to you. Why would TPWD suppot donating the meat to the needy if CWD was a problem????????? This bill is Uncontstitutioal and violates the rights of the people. Taxidermist OR NO TAXIDERMIST.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 26, 2009 07:22 PM
[#7]
|
flounder
Points:
Y (1)
/
M (1)
|
first off hardy, since that old article was posted, i was proven correct on everything that was stated. thanks for posting that. i am proud of it. i am surprised they still have it up.
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
MARCH 26, 2003
RE-Monitoring the occurrence of emerging forms of Creutzfeldt-Jakob
disease in the United States
Email Terry S. Singeltary:
flounder@wt.net
I lost my mother to hvCJD (Heidenhain Variant CJD). I would like to comment on the CDC's attempts to monitor the occurrence of emerging forms of CJD. Asante, Collinge et al [1] have reported that BSE transmission to the 129-methionine genotype can lead to an alternate phenotype that is indistinguishable from type 2 PrPSc, the commonest sporadic CJD. However, CJD and all human TSEs are not reportable nationally. CJD and all human TSEs must be made reportable in every state and internationally. I hope that the CDC does not continue to expect us to still believe that the 85%+ of all CJD cases which are sporadic are all spontaneous, without route/source. We have many TSEs in the USA in both animal and man. CWD in deer/elk is spreading rapidly and CWD does transmit to mink, ferret, cattle, and squirrel monkey by intracerebral inoculation. With the known incubation periods in other TSEs, oral transmission studies of CWD may take much longer. Every victim/family of CJD/TSEs should be asked about route and source of this agent. To prolong this will only spread the agent and needlessly expose others. In light of the findings of Asante and Collinge et al, there should be drastic measures to safeguard the medical and surgical arena from sporadic CJDs and all human TSEs. I only ponder how many sporadic CJDs in the USA are type 2 PrPSc?
http://www.neurology.org/cgi/eletters/60/2/176#535
THE PATHOLOGICAL PROTEIN
Hardcover, 304 pages plus photos and illustrations. ISBN 0-387-95508-9
June 2003
BY Philip Yam
CHAPTER 14 LAYING ODDS
Answering critics like Terry Singeltary, who feels that the U.S. under- counts CJD, Schonberger conceded that the current surveillance system has errors but stated that most of the errors will be confined to the older population.
http://www.thepathologicalprotein.com/
Diagnosis and Reporting of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Singeltary, Sr et al. JAMA.2001; 285: 733-734. Vol. 285 No. 6, February 14, 2001 JAMA
Diagnosis and Reporting of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease
To the Editor: In their Research Letter, Dr Gibbons and colleagues1 reported that the annual US death rate due to Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) has been stable since 1985. These estimates, however, are based only on reported cases, and do not include misdiagnosed or preclinical cases. It seems to me that misdiagnosis alone would drastically change these figures. An unknown number of persons with a diagnosis of Alzheimer disease in fact may have CJD, although only a small number of these patients receive the postmortem examination necessary to make this diagnosis. Furthermore, only a few states have made CJD reportable. Human and animal transmissible spongiform encephalopathies should be reportable nationwide and internationally.
Terry S. Singeltary, Sr Bacliff, Tex
1. Gibbons RV, Holman RC, Belay ED, Schonberger LB. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the United States: 1979-1998. JAMA. 2000;284:2322-2323. FREE FULL TEXT
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/extract/285/6/733?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=singeltary&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/285/6/733?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=singeltary&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT
2 January 2000 British Medical Journal U.S. Scientist should be concerned with a CJD epidemic in the U.S., as well
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/320/7226/8/b#6117
15 November 1999 British Medical Journal vCJD in the USA * BSE in U.S.
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/319/7220/1312/b#5406
Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease
http://creutzfeldt-jakob-disease.blogspot.com/
USA PRION UNIT BLOG
http://prionunitusaupdate2008.blogspot.com/
Thursday, December 04, 2008 2:37 PM
"we have found that H-BSE can infect humans."
personal communication with Professor Kong. ...TSS
see full text ;
http://bse-atypical.blogspot.com/2009/02/atypical-bse-north-america-update.html
last two cases of BSE in the USA, Texas and Alabama, both atypical
h-BSE.
The statistical incidence of CJD cases in the United States has been revised to reflect that there is one case per 9000 in adults age 55 and older. Eighty-five percent of the cases are sporadic, meaning there is no known cause at present.
http://www.cjdfoundation.org/fact.html
secondly, there is more proof today that cwd will transmit to humans, that there is not. these are the facts, or why would they have an 8 state recall on CWD positive meat, and or the warning in the May 2009 issue of the cdc.
you folks better wake up and let your egos' rest.
you can cry and complain about free speech, but when cwd is documented in Texas, your gonna be singing a different tune.
cry and complain about cut and paste, but the thick of it are the facts.
you can ignore them, ban them, or,
you can sit around and kid yourself all you want.
but what you need to do is wake up. be prepared. talk about it. but don't ignore it.
RECALLS AND FIELD CORRECTIONS: FOODS CLASS II
___________________________________
PRODUCT
a) Elk Meat, Elk Tenderloin, Frozen in plastic vacuum packaging. Each package is approximately 2 lbs., and each case is approximately 16 lbs.; Item number 755125, Recall # F-129-9;
b) Elk Meat, Elk Trim, Frozen; Item number 755155, Recall # F-130-9;
c) Elk Meat, French Rack, Chilled. Item number 755132, Recall # F-131-9;
d) Elk Meat, Nude Denver Leg. Item number 755122, Recall # F-132-9;
e) Elk Meat, New York Strip Steak, Chilled. Item number 755128, Recall # F-133-9;
f) Elk Meat, Flank Steak Frozen. Item number 755131, Recall # F-134-9;
CODE
Elk Meats with production dates of December 29, 30, and 31
RECALLING FIRM/MANUFACTURER
Recalling Firm: Sierra Meats, Reno, NV, by telephone on January 29, 2009 and press release on February 9, 2009.
Manufacturer: Noah's Ark Holding, LLC, Dawson, MN. Firm initiated recall is ongoing.
REASON
Elk products contain meat derived from an elk confirmed to have Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD).
VOLUME OF PRODUCT IN COMMERCE
Unknown
DISTRIBUTION
NV, CA, TX, CO, NY, UT, FL, OK
___________________________________
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ENFORCE/2009/ENF01099.html
Monday, February 09, 2009
Exotic Meats USA Announces Urgent Statewide Recall of Elk Tenderloin Because It May Contain Meat Derived From An Elk Confirmed To Have CWD
snip...
Cross-sequence transmission of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease creates a new prion strain
Date: August 25, 2007 at 12:42 pm PST
our results raise the possibility that CJD cases classified as VV1 may include cases caused by iatrogenic transmission of sCJD-MM1 prions or food-borne infection by type 1 prions from animals, e.g., chronic wasting disease prions in cervid. In fact, two CJD-VV1 patients who hunted deer or consumed venison have been reported (40, 41). The results of the present study emphasize the need for traceback studies and careful re-examination of the biochemical properties of sCJD-VV1 prions.
http://www.jbc.org/
snip...
Clearly, it is premature to draw firm conclusions about CWD passing naturally into humans, cattle and sheep, but the present results suggest that CWD transmissions to humans would be as limited by PrP incompatibility as transmissions of BSE or sheep scrapie to humans. Although there is no evidence that sheep scrapie has affected humans, it is likely that BSE has caused variant CJD in 74 people (definite and probable variant CJD cases to date according to the UK CJD Surveillance Unit). Given the presumably large number of people exposed to BSE infectivity, the susceptibility of humans may still be very low compared with cattle, which would be consistent with the relatively inefficient conversion of human PrP-sen by PrPBSE. Nonetheless, since humans have apparently been infected by BSE, it would seem prudent to take reasonable measures to limit exposure of humans (as well as sheep and cattle) to CWD infectivity as has been recommended for other animal TSEs.
snip...
http://www.emboj.org/current.shtml
snip
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol10no6/03-1082.htm
From: TSS (216-119-163-189.ipset45.wt.net) Subject: CWD aka MAD DEER/ELK TO HUMANS ??? Date: September 30, 2002 at 7:06 am PST
From: "Belay, Ermias" To: Cc: "Race, Richard (NIH)" ; ; "Belay, Ermias" Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 9:22 AM Subject: RE: TO CDC AND NIH - PUB MED- 3 MORE DEATHS - CWD - YOUNG HUNTERS
Dear Sir/Madam, In the Archives of Neurology you quoted (the abstract of which was attached to your email), we did not say CWD in humans will present like variant CJD.
That assumption would be wrong. I encourage you to read the whole article and call me if you have questions or need more clarification (phone: 404-639-3091). Also, we do not claim that "no-one has ever been infected with prion disease from eating venison." Our conclusion stating that we found no strong evidence of CWD transmission to humans in the article you quoted or in any other forum is limited to the patients we investigated.
Ermias Belay, M.D. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
-----Original Message----- From: Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 10:15 AM To: [log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask] Subject: TO CDC AND NIH - PUB MED- 3 MORE DEATHS - CWD - YOUNG HUNTERS
Sunday, November 10, 2002 6:26 PM ......snip........end..............TSS
snip...
full text ;
http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2009/02/exotic-meats-usa-announces-urgent.html
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 Noah's Ark Holding, LLC, Dawson, MN RECALL Elk products contain meat derived from an elk confirmed to have CWD NV, CA, TX, CO, NY, UT, FL, OK RECALLS AND FIELD CORRECTIONS: FOODS CLASS II
http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2009/03/noahs-ark-holding-llc-dawson-mn-recall.html
Subject: [CJD-L] Chronic Wasting Disease Prions in Elk Antler Velvet (Nutritional Supplements and CJD)
10.3201/eid1505.081458 Suggested citation for this article: Angers RC, Seward TS, Napier D, Green M, Hoover E, Spraker T, et al. Chronic wasting disease prions in elk antler velvet. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 May; [Epub ahead of print]
Chronic Wasting Disease Prions in Elk Antler Velvet
Rachel C. Angers,1 Tanya S. Seward, Dana Napier, Michael Green, Edward Hoover, Terry Spraker, Katherine O'Rourke, Aru Balachandran, and Glenn C. Telling Author affiliations: University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA (R.C. Angers, T.S. Seward, D. Napier, M. Green, G.C. Telling); Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (E. Hoover, T. Spraker); US Department of Agriculture, Pullman, Washington, USA (K. O'Rourke); and Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A. Balachandran) 1Current affiliation: MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a contagious, fatal prion disease of deer and elk that continues to emerge in new locations. To explore the means by which prions are transmitted with high efficiency among cervids, we examined prion infectivity in the apical skin layer covering the growing antler (antler velvet) by using CWD-susceptible transgenic mice and protein misfolding cyclic amplification. Our finding of prions in antler velvet of CWD-affected elk suggests that this tissue may play a role in disease transmission among cervids. Humans who consume antler velvet as a nutritional supplement are at risk for exposure to prions. The fact that CWD prion incubation times in transgenic mice expressing elk prion protein are consistently more rapid raises the possibility that residue 226, the sole primary structural difference between deer and elk prion protein, may be a major determinant of CWD pathogenesis.
snip...
Discussion
The transmission of CWD prions in antler velvet from 2 naturally affected elk to mice in 2 Tg models demonstrates that this tissue contains low, but detectable, amounts of CWD prions. In addition, serial PMCA amplified otherwise undetectable levels of PrPSc in antler velvet. We characterized CWD prion infectivity by end-point titration. The .6 log i.c.ID50/g CWD prion titer estimated by this method contrasts with .9 log i.c.ID50/g titers of mouse-adapted scrapie prions in rodent brains (9) and .7.7.7 log i.c.ID50/g titers of BSE prions estimated by bioassay in transgenic mice (10,11). The linear relationship between dose and incubation time (12) provides an opportunity to estimate the level of prions in materials containing an unknown amount of infectivity. The attack rates of <100% after inoculation with antler velvet preparations from elk 01-0306 and 03-0306 and the failure to transmit disease from the remaining antler velvet samples suggest that CWD prion titers are close to, or at, the end point of the Tg(CerPrP)1536+/. bioassay. Although we are aware of the limitations of comparing levels of prions in tissues from different CWD-affected cervids, we estimate the end point of the CWD prion titration using D92 to be <3.5 log i.c.ID50 units. Other factors could also influence levels of infectivity in the 4 tested samples, e.g., the portion of the antler processed and the age of the antler when harvested. Histologic evaluation indicated that the velvet samples used in these transmission studies came from elk antlers in the early stages of seasonal growth (data not shown). Whether CWD prion titers in antler velvet vary according to the state of antler growth remains to be determined. Whether prion infectivity is derived from nervous system tissue, blood (13), or another component of velvet, is also unclear. Implications for Horizontal CWD Transmission and Human Exposure Our studies indicate that antler velvet represents a previously unrecognized source of CWD prions in the environment. Whereas oral transmission of rodent-adapted scrapie prions is known to be .5 orders of magnitude less efficient than transmission by intracerebral inoculation (14,15), the relative efficiency of oral CWD prion transmission is unknown. Multiple exposures
Page 7 of 17
to low levels of CWD prions in the environment (16,17), as well as increased infectivity when prions are bound to soil minerals (18), are factors that may influence transmission. The appearance of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans exposed to bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) (19,20) and the demonstration of CWD prions in muscle (3) placed the human species barrier to CWD prions at the forefront of public health concerns. Our studies indicate that antler velvet represents an additional source for human exposure to CWD prions. Widely used in traditional Asian medicine to treat a variety of ailments including impotence, arthritis and high blood pressure, antler velvet can be readily purchased in caplet form and its usage has increased worldwide. Fortunately, to date there is no epidemiologic evidence for increased rates of CJD in the CWD-endemic region (Colorado, USA) (21,22). Also reassuring is the inefficient in vitro conversion of human PrP to protease-resistant PrP by CWD (23). Two studies have shown that CWD prions failed to induce disease in Tg mice expressing human PrP (24,25). However, the failure of BSE to be transmitted to Tg mice expressing human prion protein (HuPrP) was cited as early evidence for a BSE transmission barrier in humans (26); subsequent studies demonstrated a strong effect of the codon 129 polymorphism on transmissibility of BSE prions (27). To date, only mice expressing HuPrP with methionine at 129 have been challenged with CWD. In support of the argument that humans might be susceptible to CWD, intracerebral inoculation of squirrel monkeys produced disease after >30 months (28). Prion strain properties are also critical when considering the potential for interspecies transmission. The existence of multiple CWD strains has been suggested by several studies (4,25,29,30), but strain isolation and host range characterization have not been reported. Finally, it is worth considering that if CWD were to cross the species barrier into humans, this transmission source might not be recognized if the disease profile overlapped with one of the forms of sporadic CJD reported in North America.
Possible Role for Residue 226 in CWD Pathogenesis
Previous studies that demonstrated more rapid CWD prion incubation times in Tg mice expressing elk PrP (24,29) than in Tg(CerPrP)1536+/. mice (4) raised the possibility that the single amino acid difference at residue 226 between elk and deer PrP (5) may influence CWD pathogenesis (29). However, when the transmission characteristics of CWD isolates were directly compared in Tg mice expressing differing levels of deer or elk PrP, Tamguney et al.
Page 8 of 17
concluded that CWD incubation times were related solely to the level of PrP transgene expression (25). We compared CWD transmission in Tg(CerPrP-E226)5037+/. and Tg(CerPrP)1536+/. mice, which express PrP at levels .5-fold higher than PrP in wild type mouse brain (Figure 1A), and found that CWD transmission was consistently and substantially more rapid in Tg(CerPrP-E226)5037+/. mice. Our results appear compatible with more efficient CWD prion propagation by elk cellular prion protein (CerPrPC) containing E at residue 226 than by deer CerPrPC containing Q at this position. Consistent with this interpretation, despite 5-fold lower levels of transgene expression in Tg(CerPrP-E226)5029+/. than in Tg(CerPrP)1536+/. mice, mean incubation times of the D92 isolate were equivalent in these 2 lines (Table). Nonetheless, undetected differences in CerPrPC expression, for example in particular cell types, might result in more rapid disease and/or altered pathologic changes. The generation of transgenic mice expressing elk and deer coding sequences using gene replacement strategies would seem to be an excellent approach for resolving this issue. The different responses to CWD in Tg mice also appear to recapitulate aspects of CWD pathogenesis in the natural hosts. Previous limited comparative transmission studies indicated that CWD developed .25% more rapidly in orally challenged elk than deer (31). Although plaques were not detected in brains of CWD-affected elk, florid plaques have been observed in the brains of diseased deer (32,33). Similar differences in pathologic changes were observed in Tg(CerPrP-E226)5037+/. and Tg(CerPrP)1536+/. mice (Figure 4). Structural analyses suggest that residue 226 is located within a region of PrPC proposed to interact with a factor (34), possibly equivalent to the postulated protein X (35). Although mutation of the equivalent residue from Q to lysine (K) in epitope-tagged mouse PrP had no effect on PrPSc formation in transfected chronically infected ScN2A cells, the effects of the Q-to-E substitution were not assessed (36).
Acknowledgments We thank Dongyue Zhuang for excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by grants 2RO1NS040334-04 from the National Institute
snip...
1998 MY SUBMISSION TO THE BSE INQUIRY ENGLAND
Sender: "Patricia Cantos" <patricia.cantos at bse.org.uk>
To: "Terry S Singeltary Sr. (E-mail)" <flounder at wt.net>
Subject: Your submission to the Inquiry
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 1998 10:10:05 +0100 3 July 1998 Mr Terry S Singeltary Sr. E-Mail: Flounder at wt.net Ref: E2979 Dear Mr Singeltary, Thank you for your E-mail message of the 30th of June 1998 providing the Inquiry with your further comments. Thank you for offering to provide the Inquiry with any test results on the nutritional supplements your mother was taking before she died. As requested I am sending you our general Information Pack and a copy of the Chairman's letter. Please contact me if your system cannot read the attachments. Regarding your question, the Inquiry is looking into many aspects of the scientific evidence on BSE and nvCJD. I would refer you to the transcripts of evidence we have already heard which are found on our internet site at http://www.bse.org.uk. Could you please provide the Inquiry with a copy of the press article you refer to in your e-mail? If not an approximate date for the article so that we can locate it? In the meantime, thank you for you comments. Please do not hesitate to contact me on 0171 261 8332 should you have any queries. Yours sincerely Patricia Cantos Families Team Leader Attachments TSS
==============
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: re: METABOLIFE AND TSEs GAO-03-494 ''URGENT DATA''
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 16:04:35 -0400
From: "Marcia G Crosse" <CrosseM at gao.gov>
To: <flounder at wt.net> CC: "Charles W Davenport" <DavenportC at gao.gov>, "Carolyn Feis Korman" <FeisKormanC at gao.gov>, "Martin Gahart" <GahartM at gao.gov> Mr. Singletary, We were informed by representatives of Metabolife, Inc. that Metabolife 356 was reformulated to remove bovine complex as an ingredient in the product, approximately September 2001. We did not independently verify the contents of the product. Sincerely, Marcia Crosse Acting Director Health CarePublic Health and Science Issues U.S. General Accounting Office 441 G Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20548 =================== -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: METABOLIFE AND TSEs GAO-03-494 ''URGENT DATA'' Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 15:48:52 -0500 From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr." <flounder at wt.net> To: Marcia G Crosse <CrosseM at gao.gov> CC: Charles W Davenport <DavenportC at gao.gov>, Carolyn Feis Korman <FeisKormanC at gao.gov>, Martin Gahart <GahartM at gao.gov> References: <seb14599.014 at GAOGWIA1.GAO.GOV> THANK YOU! MIRACLES DO HAPPEN! ;-) now all we need to do is; snip...... one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind ;-) however; ''We did not independently verify the contents of the product'' ??? TSS ####### http://mailhost.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de/warc/bse-l.html ########
see history of mad cow in a pill ;
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 Detection of CWD Prions in Urine and Saliva of Deer by Transgenic Mouse Bioassay
http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2009/03/detection-of-cwd-prions-in-urine-and.html
some folks want this data. they don't want to stick their heads in the sand. they want to talk about it. they should. like i said, you can eat what you want, pour as much urine on yourself that you might think find you that big rack. i dont care. but you should not ignore the science. this has been the problem all along. ...
tss
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 26, 2009 07:53 PM
[#8]
|
flounder
Points:
Y (1)
/
M (1)
|
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
CWD to tighten taxidermy rules Hunters need to understand regulations
The movement of high-risk carcass parts (brain, spinal cord, lymph tissues) is a potential avenue through which CWD could be spread from infected areas. Investigations in New York indicate that the infection could have been spread by a taxidermist who accepted specimens from CWD-positive states, allowed rehabilitated fawns access to the taxidermy workshop and spread potentially infectious curing salt waste as a fence line weed killer on his deer farm.
for anyone interested in full text ;
Thursday, March 26, 2009
HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 26, 2009 08:30 PM
[#9]
|
weaver

Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
still no . we as taxidermist dont need a permit to be inspected by the gamewardens we already are. The way people do bussines has nothing to do with cwd
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 26, 2009 09:34 PM
[#10]
|
ruglady
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
Flounder,
I fail to see how anyone in their right mind could possibly think that permitting taxidermists would insure that Tecas would not ever get a case of CWD. Game Wardens are always welcom in our shop and over the last 25-30 years have been frequent visitors. Having a permit, issued by the State of Texas, allowing us to continue in an established business that has never been cited for any infraction will not insure that some hunter will not bring cwd into Texas.
I don't believe that you have actually read or understood what the bill is about. It's like saying "I we liscense or permit grocery store clerks, we will stopspreading high blood pressure in Texas".
Ruglady
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 26, 2009 09:33 PM
[#11]
|
wohalliburton

Points:
Y (151)
/
M (116)
|
Terry,
What does this bill do? It does nothing but regulate something that's already regulated, and create more government bureaucracy and cost tax dollars we don't have to implement. The logic you imploy for its passing is much like that used of the global warming extremists: we know the planet is getting warmer, we don't really know what to do about it or what causes it (though many would argue that point), but we're going to do something now so if you have a problem with that plan GET OUT OF THE WAY!!! Quit throwing articles at us and try dealing with some cold, hard, verifiable facts.
Its appears to me as well that you don't understand that the movement of deer hides, carcasses and skins are aleady covered by law in Texas, much like Whit said.
And, as far as I'm concerned relying on an 'investigation' in New York state over hunting issues (without really studying the report) is kind of like relying on a wolf's report concerning sheep safety.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 26, 2009 10:26 PM
[#12]
|
murphy1961

Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
flounder writes: since that old article was posted, i was proven correct on everything that was stated. thanks for posting that. i am proud of it. i am surprised they still have it up.
Mr. flounder exactly what are you most proud of? Being refuted by the Center for Disease Control or the journal Neurology? Personally, I could take pride in neither, but that's just me.
Most of the posters here are well informed, conscientious, stewards of the land. When questions do arise most look to sound science for answers. Is CWD a concern? Sure, but not to the extent some would portray. I for one, will not listen to emotion based fear-mongeringfor accurate information. Not trying to stop free speech, just exercising my right to believe research I conduct and not read endless, mind-boggling and boring drivel with continuous "links" to some article about this or that.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 27, 2009 07:41 AM
[#13]
|
Becky P
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
Permitting taxidermists will NOT stop CWD. We have absolutely no control over what hunters bring into this State. What about the hunters that do not get anything mounted by a professional? Or they bring it to you and you tell them you can't handle it because THEY didn't do what they needed to do to bring it back legally, what are they going to do with it? Throw it in a ditch somewhere and contaminate everything.
Everything in that bill is already covered in other areas and by other laws/regs. All the permit does is make us as taxidermists have to keep up with more paperwork, pay the state more money, oh, and BTW, increase YOUR prices in order to cover OUR extra cost and work.
It will not make taxidermists that are NOT following the rules now (sales tax, income tax, federal bird permit, WRD) follow them any better, they will still be the ones doing it under the table and off the records. All it will do is cause more work/cost to legit taxidermists therefore causing prices to go up.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 27, 2009 08:44 AM
[#14]
|
julie@smileystaxidermy.com
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
Permitting taxidermists will do nothing to ensure the safety of the public. In addition to the points already made by Becky and others, all a permit does is create a registry of taxidermists for the game wardens to be able to "check up" on. How would this help when, like Becky said, only taxidermists who are already following all the laws would be the only ones to go get the permit? Even if people who are "shady" get the permit, there is nothing stopping them from doing so because a permit requires no proof of education, paying taxes, or anything else. Like I said, it is just a registry of taxidermists when really, the game wardens already know where all the legally operating taxidermists are. I don't see the point or how this helps the public in any way.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 27, 2009 01:12 PM
[#15]
|
wohalliburton

Points:
Y (151)
/
M (116)
|
Several have already stated that all this bill will do is add paperwork and increase the cost of their business and thereby the cost to the consumer, as well as add repetitive rules and regulations to complicate everyone's life. I wholeheartedly agree.
But I guess the thing that bothers me most is that Terry wants us to take action without figuring-out the real effects of those actions. In other words activity somehow equals accomplishment. My question is for whom? The regulations this bill calls for are silly and repetitive...and yet here he is trying to tell us how horrible CWD is, how much we need the bill, and the bill does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to address any of the concerns he raises. If this is true then why even consider it?
That's not the purpose of legislation Mr. Singletary, and frankly I don't know what you are trying to accomplish.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 28, 2009 08:01 AM
[#16]
|
lostpinestaxidermy
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
Tell me Mr. Terry what do you mean tighten the taxidermy rules? And why did you not answer my questions about if CWD is in Texas then why is TPWD and other organizations donating there kill to needy people? Ask Whit Weaver about going down south for with TPWD and manage killing 300 + deer and sending the meat to needy people. In my eyes you are just another PETA person that don"t understand what they read and makes their own assumptions to try and stir things up. A taxidermist has no control over CWD and never will. And besides that HB4214 is about permitting taxidermists not CWD.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
March 28, 2009 08:08 AM
[#17]
|
lostpinestaxidermy
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
Oh by the way THANKS TEXAS TAXIDERMY ASSOCIATION FOR TRY TO HELP FIGHT.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 2, 2009 05:11 PM
[#18]
|
wheeless621

Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
Brown county
|
My fellow Texans and I that are here contacted our various reps to let them know how AGAINST this bill we are. Thanks Terry for bringing it to our attention.
Guns don't kill people....Its those pesky little bullets making lots of holes that all the blood leaks out of.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 7, 2009 04:58 PM
[#19]
|
Brian Claar
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
Terry. You have to be kidding me. Taxidermist are NOT the reason CWD is spread. Making a Taxidermist pay for a stupid permit WILL NOT stop CWD from entering your state. Maybe you should should put you efforts into educating your HUNTERS in your state. That is how you can help stop it from entering your state.
PA just got rid of the permit system because it made no sense, and it was not in place to stop CWD.
The PA Game commission works with the PTA and posts things on a regular basis about CWD and is trying to educate people on how to help stop the spread a CWD.
This kind of legislation is FOOLISH and won't help in any way. Your just adding another Democratic TAX to the industry and creating a job for a governors son or daughter that has NO idea on how the taxidermy industry works.
Government needs to get off their butt and find solutions that make sense, not solutions add more tax dollars to their pocket.
You need to wake up!
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 7, 2009 06:32 PM
[#20]
|
flounder
Points:
Y (1)
/
M (1)
|
Brian, i believe it is you that needs to wake up. i did not say that taxidermy was the sole reason that cwd is spread. i said that several states had thought they introduced it to their state by taxidermist. it's just another mode of transmission, one that should not be ignored. like it are not, there is a change a coming. ...terry
SUBMITTED: December 8, 2008 RESUBMITTED: January 12,2009 RESUBMITTED: February 9, 2009 RESUBMITTED: March 9,2009
APPROVED
MICHIGAN NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION ASSISTANT TO THE COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM TO THE NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
SUBJECT: Taxidermy Regulations Wildlife Conservation Order Amendment No.1 of 2009
Authority:
The Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended, authorizes the Director and the Commission to issue orders to manage wild animals in this state.
Discussion and Background:
Chronic wasting disease (CWD) poses a serious threat to the health of Michigan's deer, moose, and elk populations, both free-ranging and privately-owned, and to their long-term management. In response to this threat, the Department adopted the Michigan Surveillance and Response Plan for Chronic Wasting Disease of Free-Ranging and Privately-Owned Cervids (CWD Plan) on August 26, 2002. Based on available knowledge in 2002, the CWD Plan requires various surveillance and control measures to be implemented when CWD is documented within the state.
On August 25, 2008, the National Veterinary Services Laboratory in Ames, Iowa, confirmed CWD in a deer from a privately-owned facility in Kent County. The confirmation from Ames, Iowa, triggered the implementation of the control measures required in the CWD Plan.
It is now known that the carcasses of CWD-infected deer can serve as a source of infection. Remains from infected carcasses are known to contaminate sites for many years. For this reason, import bans exist for whole carcasses that originate from states with known CWD occurrences. Violations of these restrictions do occur.
Those areas where infected carcasses or carcass parts may be found in quantity, such as taxidermy facilities, may act as foci where infection of live cervids may occur. Taxidermy operations were not noted in the CWD Plan, as they had not yet been identified as a potential source of infection.
NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
Keith J. Charters, Chair. Mary Brown. Hurley J. Coleman, Jr.• John Madigan. J R. Richardson. Frank Wheatlake STEVENS T. MASON BUILDING. P.O. BOX 30028 • LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www.michigan.gov/dnr. (517) 373-2329 Great Lakes. Great Times. Great Outdoors!
Taxidermy Regulations Wildlife Conservation Order Amendment No.1 of 2009 Page 2 March 9, 2009
A case in the state of New York had strong evidence that a CWD-positive animal living in an enclosure was linked to a taxidermy operation. Since there are no biosecurity protocols that can assure the destruction of the CWD agent, it is prudent to take steps to reduce the likelihood of live cervids interacting with potentially infected byproducts of taxidermy operations.
This amendment proposes that taxidermy operations be conducted in a manner that byproducts and waste generated by the facility not be allowed to come into contact with live animals. There are also updates to monitoring and reporting requirements to assure compliance to all conditions of the permit.
Recommendation:
This order was submitted for information on January 8, February 5, and March 5, 2009, at the Natural Resources Commission Meetings. This item appeared on the Department's December, 2008, and January, and February 2009 calendars and may be eligible for approval on April 2, 2009.
I have analyzed and discussed these recommendations with staff and concur as to matters over which the Natural Resources Commission has authority.
Rebecca A. Humphries Director
Russ Mason, Ph.D., Chief
Wildlife Division Law Enforcement Division Resource Management Deputy
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ORDER
Amendment No.1 of 2009
By authority conferred on the Natural Resources Commission and the Director of the Department of Natural Resources by sections 40107 and 40113a of 1994 PA 451, MCL 324.41107 and 324.40113a, it is ordered that effective April 3, 2009, the following section(s) of the WiId Iife Conservation Order shall read as follows:
5.31 Taxidermy permit, rules.
Sec. 5.31. (1) A taxidermy permit shall be valid for 3 years or through the third June 30 after issue, whichever comes first.
(2) A person issued a taxidermy permit shall keep a record, in addition to the specimen tag, of all animals and animal parts which are received or disposed. All records and plumage and skins in permittee's possession shall be available for inspection by the director, a designee of the director, or conservation officer. Records, other than the specimen tag, shall be retained on the premises for six years and include the following:
(a) Name of specimen.
(b) Name and address of the person from whom received.
(c) Name and address of the person owning the specimen.
(d) County, state, province, and country where taken.
(e) Tag or seal number of game or protected animal.
(f) Date animal and animal parts received and date disposed. ( g) Name to whom product is delivered.
(3) A person issued a taxidermy permit shall only possess game, protected animals, or animal parts for the purpose of taxidermy at the location described in their taxidermy permit.
(4) For deer, elk, or moose, a person acting under the authority of a taxidermy permit shall:
(a) lf live cervids are kept on the premises of the taxidermy business:
i. Not allow any live animal to come into contact with any taxidermy materials and any waste generated from taxidermy, through the use of exclusionary structures such as gates and doors.
ii. Employ personal protective clothing, such as but not limited to coveralls, boots and gloves, by visitors and workers in the area.
iii. Employ trash receptacles within the work site for disposable protective clothing.
iv. Employ cleaning facilities to ensure that materials taken from work site, including non-disposable personal protective equipment, are free of dirt, debris, and waste materials.
v. Dispose of all animal waste products in a manner that ensures disposal to a type ll landfill.
vi. Not provide animal parts from deer, elk, or moose for use as bait for the purpose of attracting animals for hunting, trapping, or other recreational pursuits.
vii. Not provide animal parts from deer, elk, or moose for use as a food for other animals.
(b) If no live cervids are kept on the premises of the taxidermy business:
i. Dispose of all animal waste products in a manner that ensures disposal to a type ll landfill.
ii. Not provide animal parts from deer, elk, or moose for use as bait for the purpose of attracting animals for hunting, trapping, or other recreational pursuits.
iii. Not provide animal parts from deer, elk, or moose for use as food for other animals.
5.110 Special permits; fees; disposition.
Sec. 5.110. The following fees are established for permits issued by the director:
(I) Effective June 1,2009, a fee of $100.00 shall be collected for each taxidermy permit issued. Taxidermy specimen identification tags shall be $10 per fifty.
(2) A fee equivalent to the fee charged for a resident antler less deer hunting license shall be collected for each managed deer hunting permit and each deer management assistance permit purchased by a permittee.
(3) All moneys received from the sale of permits and licenses as provided in this section shall be turned over to the state treasurer and credited to the game and fish protection fund.
(4) No fee shall be collected for any of the following permits:
(a) Highway killed deer/bear permit.
(b) Deer damage shooting permit.
(c) Damage and nuisance animal control permit, including disease control and disease control replacement permits.
(d) Rehabilitation permit.
(e) Permit to take game with a crossbow.
Issued this 2nd day of April, 2009.
Approved as to matters over which the Natural Resources Commission has authority.
Keith J. Charters, Chairman Natural Resources Commission
Approved as to matters over which the Director has authority.
Rebecca A. Humphries Director
FINAL
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
CWD to tighten taxidermy rules Hunters need to understand regulations
The movement of high-risk carcass parts (brain, spinal cord, lymph tissues) is a potential avenue through which CWD could be spread from infected areas. Investigations in New York indicate that the infection could have been spread by a taxidermist who accepted specimens from CWD-positive states, allowed rehabilitated fawns access to the taxidermy workshop and spread potentially infectious curing salt waste as a fence line weed killer on his deer farm.
for anyone interested in full text ;
Thursday, March 26, 2009
HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 7, 2009 06:45 PM
[#21]
|
flounder
Points:
Y (1)
/
M (1)
|
WHY WE NEED RULES FOR TAXIDERMY, CASE IN POINT ;
lostpinestaxidermy
Points: Y (23) / M (0)
|
Tell me Mr. Terry what do you mean tighten the taxidermy rules? And why did you not answer my questions about if CWD is in Texas then why is TPWD and other organizations donating there kill to needy people? Ask Whit Weaver about going down south for with TPWD and manage killing 300 + deer and sending the meat to needy people. In my eyes you are just another PETA person that don"t understand what they read and makes their own assumptions to try and stir things up.
A taxidermist has no control over CWD and never will.
And besides that HB4214 is about permitting taxidermists not CWD.
|
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 7, 2009 07:47 PM
[#22]
|
Brian Claar
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
Greetings Texas Hunters,
THIS is a
very important bill. I know most officials in Texas could not say CWD
(would not for fear of someone talking about it), but this is really
what this bill is all about. Several states have introduced CWD into
their state by Taxidermist, from what the investigations have
concluded. SO i would suggest that every hunter out there push for this
bill to pass. YOU DO NOT WANT CWD BROUGHT INTO TEXAS
You said this bill was really about taxidermist spreading CWD, not me.
HUNTERS spread CWD into states not taxidermist. Don't you see that education is needed, not taxation and government sticking there nose into something they know nothing about? You probably can't find 10 representatives in your state that really even know what CWD is. Why don't you rally for education, which makes much more sense.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 7, 2009 07:53 PM
[#23]
|
Browns Taxidermy
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
Tell me this Terry. If taxidermists are spreading CWD why are'nt all of us taxidermists dead yet? We are probably the most careful hunters and animal handlers that you can find. Go ahead and send it underground and watch the poachers go nuts! You don't have a clue!
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 7, 2009 08:19 PM
[#24]
|
wohalliburton

Points:
Y (151)
/
M (116)
|
Terry,
You're going to have to give us a little more information proving the taxidermists transmit CWD. Some vague reference in a report from New York isn't even a start. Besides, the links you provide don't work to review it. And, with this supporting information let's deal with cold, hard, verifiable facts here, not reports that use the word "could", "might", and "may have". When the dust clears, my guess is that there won't be anything to post.
And, like I've said before, the additional regulations in this bill do absolutely nothing to curb the transmission of CWD.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 7, 2009 08:46 PM
[#25]
|
Becky P
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
"i said that several states had thought they introduced it to their state by taxidermist. it's just another mode of transmission, one that should not be ignored"
Say whaaat??? The taxidermists are NOT the ones bringing the animals into the state, HUNTERS bring the animals into the state. And if they do that without going through the proper procedures, it is they, the hunters, that introduce it into the state, NOT the taxidermists.
You also say they "thought", hmm, well maybe they need to do some rethinking.
Tell me why, we, the taxidermists, are being labeled the bad guys here? Do the hunters not have any resposibilities? If they pass this on the taxidermists, you can bet the next thing will be some stupid law on the hunters, like say maybe, you can't hunt outside the state or you can't bring ANY of your kill back with you. You let them get one toe in the door with the stupidity and it will not end 'til they have killed hunting rights all together. Stop and think about it. How many rights are you willing to give up? Do you really want to quit hunting?
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 7, 2009 09:03 PM
[#26]
|
Becky P
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
Tell me where in that bill that it says anything about CWD.
I see your addition at the bottom about the place in New York. If the HUNTER had done what he was suppose to the contaminated part would've never made it to the taxidermist in the first place. It starts with the hunters doing their part. Granted the taxidermist should not have accepted it but he could already get in trouble for that WITHOUT this crappy bill.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 7, 2009 09:55 PM
[#27]
|
flounder
Points:
Y (1)
/
M (1)
|
browns taxidermy wrotw;
>>>Tell me this Terry. If taxidermists are spreading CWD why are'nt all of us taxidermists dead yet? We are probably the most careful hunters and animal handlers that you can find. Go ahead and send it underground and watch the poachers go nuts! You don't have a clue!<<<
ACCTUALLY, occupational expossure is a known factor with TSE.
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories Fifth Edition 2007 (occupational exposure to prion diseases)
AND ignorance has led to many more exposed. the million dollar question is one you ask, why some do and some don't, i cannot answer that. the incubation period fools many, but it only takes one bad apple to spoil the bunch, and when were speaking of a state with no cwd documented to date, while cwd spreads to other states, and it is at our NM border, and it's been documented in Oklahoma, we must take all precautions in my opinion. look, were not speaking of a regular pathogen, and if a little extra work, a tax, a paper trail, whatever it takes to keep cwd out of Texas. everyone has to take part to keep this from happening. your just a taxidermist that does not want anymore burdon. just like the game farms in that aspect. nobody wants to take any responsibility. i am not pointing fingers at any one person, i am pointing a finger at everyone. it will take all of us.
CWD in Oklahoma
SCWDS Briefs, July 1998, 14.2
snip...
From 1996 to present, the Oklahoma herd received more than 80 elk from commercial sources in Montana and Idaho, and fortunately, the ranch has not dispersed animals to other places.
snip...
WHAT would have happened if these above mentioned elk had been sourced out, hunted, shot, then sent to a 'bad apple' so to speak Taxidermy, to be mounted? waste by-product of the mount thrown out, maybe even burried. the seed has been planted friend, and believe me, you do not want to harvest that fruit. you just think you have problems now with a bill trying to help keep cwd at bay.
Six men arrested for illegal deer trade Year-long investigation into black market Updated: Monday, 15 Dec 2008, 11:09 AM CST Published : Monday, 15 Dec 2008, 11:09 AM CST
Jackie Vega AUSTIN (KXAN) - Game wardens in the Special Operations Unit of Texas Parks and Wildlife Department’s Law Enforcement Division arrested six men and executed two search warrants as part of Operation Texas Shuffle, a year-long investigation into the black market deer trade in Texas.
"Our focus here is stopping two main areas of criminal activity: deer being brought illegally across state lines and wild deer being illegally laundered into deer breeding facilities," said Col. Pete Flores, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department law enforcement director.
Five of the men were arrested Thursday, including .........end
TRACEABILITY, i have heard some of the same arguements from the cattlemen/women et al, nobody wants to keep records, only because they do not want to be traced back to. that is why most folks in the cattle industry are against NAIS. my gosh, if you just look at the birth and herd cohorts of the mad cow in Texas (the one they did finally document only because of an act of Congress), and Alabama, the traceability of those animals were a joke.
Friday, March 13, 2009
NAIS comments NCBA and R-Calf Wednesday, March 11, 2009 – 10:30 a.m. Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry — Public Hearing
i am finding it difficult to understand why the hunters do not support this bill ???
it would seem that they too would want to keep CWD at bay, from every front, common sense and science shows that Taxidermy is a potential risk factor for spreading CWD if not done properly.
oh well, just my opinion folks. take em or leave em, cuss me, hate me, call me the peta boogeyman, it really does not matter, i have heard it all. but understand this, you do not want CWD documented in TEXAS, if it is not here already. ...
ANOTHER CASE IN POINT ;
Becky P
Points: Y (48) / M (27)
|
Tell me where in that bill that it says anything about CWD.
I see your addition at the bottom about the place in New York. If the HUNTER had done what he was suppose to the contaminated part would've never made it to the taxidermist in the first place. It starts with the hunters doing their part.
Granted the taxidermist should not have accepted it
but he could already get in trouble for that WITHOUT this crappy bill.
LIKE I SAID, it will take all of us. we do not have CWD documented yet, and the finger pointing has already started. AS i said, nobody wants to take responsibility. ...TSS
|
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 7, 2009 10:06 PM
[#28]
|
Becky P
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
No one wants to take responsibility.
So just how does this bill fix that? The regs are already there, all they have to do is enforce what they already have. This bill will do nothing more but give them a toe in the door, make us have more paperwork, make us pay more, and cause you to pay more if you go to a legit, professional taxidermist.
So when our prices go up, how many of you are going to start complaining and go look for someone doing things under the table without a permit just so you can get your mount cheaper?
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 7, 2009 10:13 PM
[#29]
|
flounder
Points:
Y (1)
/
M (1)
|
why every hunter should support this bill, another case in point ;
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 7, 2009 10:06 PM [#28] |
Becky P
Points: Y (49) / M (28)
|
No one wants to take responsibility.
So just how does this bill fix that? The regs are already there, all they have to do is enforce what they already have. This bill will do nothing more but give them a toe in the door, make us have more paperwork, make us pay more, and cause you to pay more
***if you go to a legit, professional taxidermist.
So when our prices go up, how many of you are going to start complaining and go look for someone doing things under the table without a permit just so you can get your mount cheaper?
|
***if you go to a legit, professional taxidermist.
ONE BAD SEED !!!
terry
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 7, 2009 11:26 PM
[#30]
|
Hogsbane
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
And next we should high fence the the borders of the state. So no non-Texas deer can cross into our state. (might help a little on the southern border too) And every one of us should buy one of those sterile invironment bubbles to live in and never come into contact with another human being. That would put a stop to all comunicable diseases. Reproduction will only be done through the medical community, and we coupld have a monitor in each of our houses so that the gov't can make sure we follow the rules. I mean we should be willing to give up anything to stop diseases from entering our society.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 8, 2009 02:12 AM
[#31]
|
Hardy

Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
Starr county
|
Terry,
Let me try to put this to you again. While I have never stated that I think we should ignore CWD or discontinue studies into it, you have to realize that you do an absolutely HORRIBLE job of rallying people to your cause on here.
I mean, here I am a fence rider (let's just say), and I would run like hell in the other direction from someone who lobbies the way you do. Why is it so difficult to understand that people respond to common sense, cold hard facts (not maybe, could and might) and to someone who can successfully communicate the information to their target audience.
I have to say that I feel like your presence here is either as a pure alarmist, or you're just doing a very poor job at conveying the information and getting people to understand and agree with your side of this.
If it were me, and I believed in a cause as feverishly as you do this one, I would find someone who could improve my chances of success to do the arguing/convincing for me.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 8, 2009 06:56 AM
[#32]
|
Becky P
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
why every hunter should support this bill, another case in point ;
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 7, 2009 10:06 PM [#28] |
Becky P
Points: Y (49) / M (28)
|
No one wants to take responsibility.
So just how does this bill fix that? The regs are already there, all they have to do is enforce what they already have. This bill will do nothing more but give them a toe in the door, make us have more paperwork, make us pay more, and cause you to pay more
***if you go to a legit, professional taxidermist.
So when our prices go up, how many of you are going to start complaining and go look for someone doing things under the table without a permit just so you can get your mount cheaper?
|
***if you go to a legit, professional taxidermist.
ONE BAD SEED !!!
terry
HUH?????
All they have to do in enforce the rules that are on the books now. there is NO need for the permit.
You don't need a permit to be legit. ANYONE could get the permit, but there is nothing to prove you know what you're doing, just a piece of paper that anyone can get. Fill out the application, pay your fee, get a permit, and voila, you're a taxidermist. That piece of paper doesn't make you a taxidermist.
There are hacks out there that do not fill out the required paperwork now and that don't have the licenses and permits they are supposed to have now. This bill won't stop that. If they wanted to shut those people down, they could do it simply by enforcing the law on the books now.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 8, 2009 09:51 AM
[#33]
|
wohalliburton

Points:
Y (151)
/
M (116)
|
Terry,
You're losing your audience here...the point of your original post is to garner support for a taxidermy bill.
I don't think anyone here doubts that CWD is a problem and that there is a future risk to it coming here to Texas. Lets get past that, and all the fear mongering, and the pointing out of what you think may be someone's less-informed ideas on the subject.
So (again)...considering the regulations already in place how does this bill affect the spread of CWD? Please, as I've said before, stick with cold, hard, verifiable facts only.
As a non-taxidermist that would aid in my understanding of what you want us to support.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 8, 2009 01:05 PM
[#34]
|
Brian Claar
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
He cant answer you question, because it doesn't.
From what I can see, Terry knows nothing about it. He cuts and pastes a a bunch of garbage that has nothing to do with his point. He doesn't understand how CWD is brought into different states, and acts like he has been fighting this for years.
He acts like a PETA person and a Democrap, because he pushing for a way to burden Taxidermist with a meaningless permit and to ignorant to try teaching the hunters about the dangers of CWD, which most of us would be for.
Taxidermist are not Doctors, nurses, teachers or Lawyers.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 13, 2009 11:02 AM
[#35]
|
flounder
Points:
Y (1)
/
M (1)
|
New Bio-Security Regulations Adopted for Taxidermists
Contact: Mike Bailey 517-373-1263 Agency: Natural Resources
April 3, 2009 In the wake of chronic wasting disease (CWD), the Natural Resources Commission has approved new bio-security regulations for Michigan taxidermists.
There is evidence from other states to suggest that carcasses from CWD-infected animals have led to new CWD infections. A case of CWD in New York was linked to a business that had both captive cervids and taxidermy operations.
The new regulations prohibit taxidermists with captive cervids on their premises from allowing live animals to have contact with any taxidermy materials or waste. All animal waste must be disposed of in a type II landfill, which accepts general household waste. And taxidermists may not provide any parts of deer, elk, or moose to be used for the purposes of attracting animals for hunting, trapping, or other recreational pursuits. The new regulations include increased fees and reporting requirements.
It is already illegal for hunters to bring into Michigan any parts of deer, elk or moose other than boned meat, antlers, hides, and cleaned skull caps from animals taken in any state or province where CWD is known to exist. It is illegal to possess such a carcass that has been illegally imported into Michigan. It is also illegal to possess a carcass from the CWD surveillance zone in Kent County, unless it has tested negative for CWD.
The new regulations were adopted after many months of meetings involving state wildlife officials, members of the Michigan Taxidermy Association and the public.
For more information on CWD, check the Department of Natural Resources Web site at www.michigan.gov/dnr.
here's the final rule for anyone interested ;
SUBMITTED: December 8, 2008 RESUBMITTED: January 12,2009 RESUBMITTED: February 9, 2009 RESUBMITTED: March 9,2009
SUBMITTED: December 8, 2008 RESUBMITTED: January 12,2009 RESUBMITTED: February 9, 2009 RESUBMITTED: March 9,2009
APPROVED
MICHIGAN NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION ASSISTANT TO THE COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM TO THE NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
SUBJECT: Taxidermy Regulations Wildlife Conservation Order Amendment No.1 of 2009
Authority:
The Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended, authorizes the Director and the Commission to issue orders to manage wild animals in this state.
Discussion and Background:
Chronic wasting disease (CWD) poses a serious threat to the health of Michigan's deer, moose, and elk populations, both free-ranging and privately-owned, and to their long-term management. In response to this threat, the Department adopted the Michigan Surveillance and Response Plan for Chronic Wasting Disease of Free-Ranging and Privately-Owned Cervids (CWD Plan) on August 26, 2002. Based on available knowledge in 2002, the CWD Plan requires various surveillance and control measures to be implemented when CWD is documented within the state.
On August 25, 2008, the National Veterinary Services Laboratory in Ames, Iowa, confirmed CWD in a deer from a privately-owned facility in Kent County. The confirmation from Ames, Iowa, triggered the implementation of the control measures required in the CWD Plan.
It is now known that the carcasses of CWD-infected deer can serve as a source of infection. Remains from infected carcasses are known to contaminate sites for many years. For this reason, import bans exist for whole carcasses that originate from states with known CWD occurrences. Violations of these restrictions do occur.
Those areas where infected carcasses or carcass parts may be found in quantity, such as taxidermy facilities, may act as foci where infection of live cervids may occur. Taxidermy operations were not noted in the CWD Plan, as they had not yet been identified as a potential source of infection.
NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
Keith J. Charters, Chair. Mary Brown. Hurley J. Coleman, Jr.• John Madigan. J R. Richardson. Frank Wheatlake STEVENS T. MASON BUILDING. P.O. BOX 30028 • LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www.michigan.gov/dnr. (517) 373-2329 Great Lakes. Great Times. Great Outdoors!
Taxidermy Regulations Wildlife Conservation Order Amendment No.1 of 2009 Page 2 March 9, 2009
A case in the state of New York had strong evidence that a CWD-positive animal living in an enclosure was linked to a taxidermy operation. Since there are no biosecurity protocols that can assure the destruction of the CWD agent, it is prudent to take steps to reduce the likelihood of live cervids interacting with potentially infected byproducts of taxidermy operations.
This amendment proposes that taxidermy operations be conducted in a manner that byproducts and waste generated by the facility not be allowed to come into contact with live animals. There are also updates to monitoring and reporting requirements to assure compliance to all conditions of the permit.
Recommendation:
This order was submitted for information on January 8, February 5, and March 5, 2009, at the Natural Resources Commission Meetings. This item appeared on the Department's December, 2008, and January, and February 2009 calendars and may be eligible for approval on April 2, 2009.
I have analyzed and discussed these recommendations with staff and concur as to matters over which the Natural Resources Commission has authority.
Rebecca A. Humphries Director
Russ Mason, Ph.D., Chief
Wildlife Division Law Enforcement Division Resource Management Deputy
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ORDER
Amendment No.1 of 2009
By authority conferred on the Natural Resources Commission and the Director of the Department of Natural Resources by sections 40107 and 40113a of 1994 PA 451, MCL 324.41107 and 324.40113a, it is ordered that effective April 3, 2009, the following section(s) of the WiId Iife Conservation Order shall read as follows:
5.31 Taxidermy permit, rules.
Sec. 5.31. (1) A taxidermy permit shall be valid for 3 years or through the third June 30 after issue, whichever comes first.
(2) A person issued a taxidermy permit shall keep a record, in addition to the specimen tag, of all animals and animal parts which are received or disposed. All records and plumage and skins in permittee's possession shall be available for inspection by the director, a designee of the director, or conservation officer. Records, other than the specimen tag, shall be retained on the premises for six years and include the following:
(a) Name of specimen.
(b) Name and address of the person from whom received.
(c) Name and address of the person owning the specimen.
(d) County, state, province, and country where taken.
(e) Tag or seal number of game or protected animal.
(f) Date animal and animal parts received and date disposed. ( g) Name to whom product is delivered.
(3) A person issued a taxidermy permit shall only possess game, protected animals, or animal parts for the purpose of taxidermy at the location described in their taxidermy permit.
(4) For deer, elk, or moose, a person acting under the authority of a taxidermy permit shall:
(a) lf live cervids are kept on the premises of the taxidermy business:
i. Not allow any live animal to come into contact with any taxidermy materials and any waste generated from taxidermy, through the use of exclusionary structures such as gates and doors.
ii. Employ personal protective clothing, such as but not limited to coveralls, boots and gloves, by visitors and workers in the area.
iii. Employ trash receptacles within the work site for disposable protective clothing.
iv. Employ cleaning facilities to ensure that materials taken from work site, including non-disposable personal protective equipment, are free of dirt, debris, and waste materials.
v. Dispose of all animal waste products in a manner that ensures disposal to a type ll landfill.
vi. Not provide animal parts from deer, elk, or moose for use as bait for the purpose of attracting animals for hunting, trapping, or other recreational pursuits.
vii. Not provide animal parts from deer, elk, or moose for use as a food for other animals.
(b) If no live cervids are kept on the premises of the taxidermy business:
i. Dispose of all animal waste products in a manner that ensures disposal to a type ll landfill.
ii. Not provide animal parts from deer, elk, or moose for use as bait for the purpose of attracting animals for hunting, trapping, or other recreational pursuits.
iii. Not provide animal parts from deer, elk, or moose for use as food for other animals.
5.110 Special permits; fees; disposition.
Sec. 5.110. The following fees are established for permits issued by the director:
(I) Effective June 1,2009, a fee of $100.00 shall be collected for each taxidermy permit issued. Taxidermy specimen identification tags shall be $10 per fifty.
(2) A fee equivalent to the fee charged for a resident antler less deer hunting license shall be collected for each managed deer hunting permit and each deer management assistance permit purchased by a permittee.
(3) All moneys received from the sale of permits and licenses as provided in this section shall be turned over to the state treasurer and credited to the game and fish protection fund.
(4) No fee shall be collected for any of the following permits:
(a) Highway killed deer/bear permit.
(b) Deer damage shooting permit.
(c) Damage and nuisance animal control permit, including disease control and disease control replacement permits.
(d) Rehabilitation permit.
(e) Permit to take game with a crossbow.
Issued this 2nd day of April, 2009.
Approved as to matters over which the Natural Resources Commission has authority.
Keith J. Charters, Chairman Natural Resources Commission
Approved as to matters over which the Director has authority.
Rebecca A. Humphries Director
FINAL
Thursday, March 26, 2009
HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
CWD Infection Studies in Two Species of Non-Human Primates Bruce Chesebro Laboratory of Persistent Virus Diseases, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, Hamilton, Montana USA 59840. CWD is a TSE/prion disease present in wild and domestic cervid populations of North America. CWD from cervids might possibly spread to humans who hunt and eat these species and to domestic animals such as cattle, sheep or horses sharing the same habitat. Therefore, it is important to understand the potential for spread of CWD to other species. Laboratory experiments have shown that CWD does not cause disease in transgenic mice expressing human PrP, suggesting that humans and other primates might be resistant to this infection. However, earlier data from the laboratory of Richard Marsh found that squirrel monkeys could be infected by intracerebral CWD inoculation. We recently followed up this work extending it to studies of two primate species, squirrel monkeys and Cynomolgus macaques. We also compared intracerebral and oral routes of infection. To search for possible CWD variant strains we analyzed 8 different CWD pools obtained from wild or domestic elk, mule deer and white-tailed deer. The results of these experiments will be presented. http://www.istitutoveneto.it/prion_09/Abstracts_09.pdfJ Virol. 2005 November; 79(21): 13794-13796. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.21.13794-13796.2005. PMCID: PMC1262585 Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology Interspecies Transmission of Chronic Wasting Disease Prions to Squirrel Monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) Richard F. Marsh,1? Anthony E. Kincaid,2 Richard A. Bessen,3 and Jason C. Bartz4* Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706,1 Department of Physical Therapy,2 Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska 68178,4 Department of Veterinary Molecular Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 597183 *Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178. Phone: (402) 280-1811. Fax: (402) 280-1875. E-mail: jbartz@creighton.edu. ?Deceased. Received May 3, 2005; Accepted August 10, 2005. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Top AbstractChronic wasting disease (CWD) is an emerging prion disease of deer and elk. The risk of CWD transmission to humans following exposure to CWD-infected tissues is unknown. To assess the susceptibility of nonhuman primates to CWD, two squirrel monkeys were inoculated with brain tissue from a CWD-infected mule deer. The CWD-inoculated squirrel monkeys developed a progressive neurodegenerative disease and were euthanized at 31 and 34 months postinfection. Brain tissue from the CWD-infected squirrel monkeys contained the abnormal isoform of the prion protein, PrP-res, and displayed spongiform degeneration. This is the first reported transmission of CWD to primates. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1262585P1 THE ENVIRONMENT AS A RESERVOIR OF PRION INFECTIVITY Aiken, Judd1,2, Chris Johnson4, Debbie McKenzie1,3 and Joel Pedersen5 1 Centre for Prions and Protein Folding Diseases, 2 Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutritional Sciences, 3 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta Canada, 4 National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, WI and 5 Department of Soil Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison An environmental reservoir of prion infectivity has long been known to be a source of infection of sheep scrapie and likely plays an even more important role in the transmission of chronic wasting disease (CWD) in elk, deer and moose. Prion infectivity is extremely resistant to degradation, resulting in an environmental persistence of infectious agent. CWD is a contagious disease of free-ranging cervids. Infected deer and elk release infectious agent into the environment from body fluids and from diseased animal carcasses. The rapid expansion of CWD in North America represents a significant and continued environmental risk not only to cervids but to other species as well. Our work has demonstrated that prion protein, including PrPCWD, binds avidly to soil and soil components. Significantly, prion/soil binding enhances disease transmission suggesting that the soils, once contaminated with infectious prions, plays a critical role in maintaining and perpetuating prion infections. III International Symposium on THE NEW PRION BIOLOGY: BASIC SCIENCE, DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY 2 - 4 APRIL 2009, VENEZIA (ITALY) http://www.istitutoveneto.it/prion_09/Abstracts_09.pdfP35 ADAPTATION OF CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE (CWD) INTO HAMSTERS, EVIDENCE OF A WISCONSIN STRAIN OF CWD Chad Johnson1, Judd Aiken2,3,4 and Debbie McKenzie4,5 1 Department of Comparative Biosciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison WI, USA 53706 2 Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutritional Sciences, 3 Alberta Veterinary Research Institute, 4.Center for Prions and Protein Folding Diseases, 5 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB, Canada T6G 2P5 The identification and characterization of prion strains is increasingly important for the diagnosis and biological definition of these infectious pathogens. Although well-established in scrapie and, more recently, in BSE, comparatively little is known about the possibility of prion strains in chronic wasting disease (CWD), a disease affecting free ranging and captive cervids, primarily in North America. We have identified prion protein variants in the white-tailed deer population and demonstrated that Prnp genotype affects the susceptibility/disease progression of white-tailed deer to CWD agent. The existence of cervid prion protein variants raises the likelihood of distinct CWD strains. Small rodent models are a useful means of identifying prion strains. We intracerebrally inoculated hamsters with brain homogenates and phosphotungstate concentrated preparations from CWD positive hunter-harvested (Wisconsin CWD endemic area) and experimentally infected deer of known Prnp genotypes. These transmission studies resulted in clinical presentation in primary passage of concentrated CWD prions. Subclinical infection was established with the other primary passages based on the detection of PrPCWD in the brains of hamsters and the successful disease transmission upon second passage. Second and third passage data, when compared to transmission studies using different CWD inocula (Raymond et al., 2007) indicate that the CWD agent present in the Wisconsin white-tailed deer population is different than the strain(s) present in elk, mule-deer and white-tailed deer from the western United States endemic region. http://www.istitutoveneto.it/prion_09/Abstracts_09.pdf
if anyone here is interested, full text ;
TSS
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 13, 2009 11:23 AM
[#36]
|
wheeless621

Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
Brown county
|
Man, some people just never learn.
Guns don't kill people....Its those pesky little bullets making lots of holes that all the blood leaks out of.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 13, 2009 11:20 AM
[#37]
|
wohalliburton

Points:
Y (151)
/
M (116)
|
This is cold, hard facts? What were the laws in Michigan before this Order was passed versus existing laws in Texas concerning taxidermy and the lawful possession and transfer of harvested game species?
Three quarters of your links do not work, so either the sites don't exist, the references were pulled from the site, or you need to check your links before posting. Throwing a bunch of links on a post means absolutely nothing if they can not be verified or evaluated. And, this Instituto Veneto di Scienze is in Europe...I doubt their intelligensia would be very favorable towards hunting simply because of mindset, so right there I'm not real sure that they're beyond putting 'spin' on whatever they present. Pretty shoddy documentation on your part to say the least.
And, you still have not answered my question about how this legislation you want us to support will affect the spread of CWD, in light of existing law.
Terry, if you're trying to overwhelm us with information that will not work. You're going to have to deal with verifiable information, including analysis, neither of which you have provided. I'm open to discussion of those pertinent facts, when you provide them, but what you've provided here is nothing more than fragmented verbage, unsubstantiated heresay (at this point), and implied fear mongering. Unfortunately some of what you've said has the smell of politically-correct propaganda, and enough of us are sick enough of that type of communication that we'll turn off like a switch.
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 13, 2009 11:52 AM
[#38]
|
flounder
Points:
Y (1)
/
M (1)
|
Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act 2-16-9 FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS !!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS !!!
not no, but hell no !!!
TSS
Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act 2-16-9
Very Important for you to be aware of a new bill HR 45 introduced into the House.
This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act of 2009.
We just learned yesterday about this on the Peter Boyles radio program.
Even gun shop owners didn't know about this because it is flying under the radar.
To find out about this - go to any government website and type in HR 45 or Google HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009. You will get all the information.
Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm - any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless:
·It is registered
·You are fingerprinted
·You supply a current Driver's License
·You supply your Social Security #
·You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing
·Each update - change or ownership through private or public sale must be reported and costs $25 - Failure to do so you automatically lose the right to own a firearm and are subject up to a year in jail.
·There is a child provision clause on page 16 section 305 stating a child-access provision. Gun must be locked and inaccessible to any child under 18.
They would have the right to come and inspect that you are storing your gun safely away from accessibility to children and fine is punishable for up to 5 yrs. in prison.
If you think this is a joke - go to the website and take your pick of many options to read this. It is long and lengthy. But, more and more people are becoming aware of this. Pass the word along. Any hunters in your family - pass this along.
Peter Boyles is on this and having guests. Listen to him on K.H.O.W. 6:30 a.m. in the morning.. He suggests the best way to fight this is to tell all your friends about it and "spring into action". Also he suggests we all join a pro-gun group like the Colorado Rifle Association, hunting associations, gun clubs and especially the NRA.
This is just a "termite" approach to complete confiscation of guns and disarming of our society to the point we have no defense - chip away a little here and there until the goal is accomplished before anyone realizes it.
This is one to act on whether you own a gun or not.
If you take my gun, only the criminal will have one to use against me. HR 45 only makes me/us less safe. After working with convicts for 26 years I know this bill, if passed, would make them happy and in less danger from their victims.
Please.. copy and send this out to EVERYONE in the USA
More On Gun Grab HR 45 Here....
WE MUST STOP THIS BILL NOW, DEAD IN IT'S TRACKS !!!
TSS
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 13, 2009 03:20 PM
[#39]
|
wohalliburton

Points:
Y (151)
/
M (116)
|
All this is well and good (HR 45 is a serious problem), but what does that have to do with taxidermy, CWD, and HB 4214?
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
April 20, 2009 04:04 PM
[#40]
|
Encinal

Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
Somebody needs to disable CTRL+V for this dude...
It drives him insane that we don't have CWD... It would make it a lot easier for him and all the other CWD alarmists if we did... they could use it to drive all their anti-fence, anti-feed, anti-deer breeder agendas all the more... but since Texas... the MECCA of landowner rights doesn't have CWD they have a hard time falsly connecting all those dots...
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
August 4, 2009 03:07 PM
[#41]
|
steve leech
Points:
Y (0)
/
M (0)
|
This is rediculous, how can CWD get from an expired animal at the taxidermist to a live animal in the field? This is just a ploy to put more regulations on taxidermist, and do you think for a minute that hunters won't bring their kill into texas anyway, and get some unliscened garage taxidermist to do it. we've never had a case of CWD that I know of in texas, and certainly never a person catching it, so I think were just fine
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
February 2, 2010 11:02 AM
[#42]
|
flounder
Points:
Y (1)
/
M (1)
|
Texas needs desperately to update it's cwd surveillance and testing for CWD. It's only a matter of time. I say if your gonna keep CWD out of Texas, Texas should have acted long ago, instead of waiting until CWD is actually documented. ...TSS
CWD Taxidermy
Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC)
Recommendations for Disposing of Taxidermy and Processing Waste from Deer
In recent years, concerns have increased about the possibility of moving disease from one state to another via deer and elk carcasses, or taxidermy specimens. The U.S., for instance, strictly regulates the import of African taxidermy specimens, due to the presence of foot-andmouth disease (FMD) in Africa. For this same reason, game meat from Africa cannot be imported.
Although the U.S. has not seen FMD since 1929, a number of domestic diseases are known to affect game animals. Bovine tuberculosis, or cattle TB, (Mycobacterium bovis) affects some deer and elk in parts of Michigan and could be transported to another site in a carcass. Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD), though not known to be a human health threat, causes worry among states. Moving a CWD-affected carcass -- and particularly lymph nodes, the brain and the spinal cord -- could potentially create environmental contamination that may infect deer in another area. This situation recently rose to the forefront in New York, when the state’s first known CWD-infected animal was a white-tailed deer doe owned by a taxidermist. The investigation in New York now indicates that taxidermy specimens from other states were not involved.
While tanned hides and capes create very low risk for disease transmission, “green” hides and material trimmed from the cape and skull (including brain material) pose a higher risk. Proper disposal of all waste material is essential to prevent potential disease transmission.
Some accepted means of disposal include:
?? Incinerating organic waste material in an approved incinerator, not by open burning, even in a pit. Open burning usually violates clean air statutes.
?? Burying organic waste material under at least 6 feet of soil. Dumping the waste material on open ground is not acceptable, as it makes waste material available to scavengers, such as feral pigs, coyotes, vultures, deer or other game animals.
?? Placing organic waste material in a legal land fill. Always obtain permission from the land fill operator. These sites are acceptable, as the waste should be covered that day.
Using acceptable disposal methods reduces the risk of disease and helps to protect Texas’ wildlife, hunting, and associated industries for future generations.
6/05
Texas Chronic Wasting Disease Management Plan Revised (April 24, 2003) Prepared by The Texas Animal Health Commission And The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
New Chronic Wasting Disease Surveillance Regulations Proposed for Free-Ranging and Captive Elk in Texas
October 12, 2009
Dear Texas Taxidermist,
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
CWD to tighten taxidermy rules Hunters need to understand regulations
The movement of high-risk carcass parts (brain, spinal cord, lymph tissues) is a potential avenue through which CWD could be spread from infected areas. Investigations in New York indicate that the infection could have been spread by a taxidermist who accepted specimens from CWD-positive states, allowed rehabilitated fawns access to the taxidermy workshop and spread potentially infectious curing salt waste as a fence line weed killer on his deer farm.
for anyone interested in full text ;
Thursday, March 26, 2009
HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
Friday, January 15, 2010
Sixteen Additional Deer Test Positive for Chronic Wasting Disease In Hampshire County, West Virginia
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Chronic Wasting Disease Found in White-tailed Deer in Virginia
CWD ILLINOIS UPDATE 2010 *Update January 6, 2010
Thursday, January 21, 2010 Kansas has more CWD cases
TEXAS, you see what happened with Virginia, do not flounder with CWD in Texas. oh, you can continue to ignore it if you want, but it will eventually find you. ...TSS
Sunday, October 04, 2009
CWD NEW MEXICO SPREADING SOUTH TO TEXAS 2009
Sunday, December 06, 2009
Detection of Sub-Clinical CWD Infection in Conventional Test-Negative Deer Long after Oral Exposure to Urine and Feces from CWD+ Deer
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Infectious Prions in Pre-Clinical Deer and Transmission of Chronic Wasting Disease Solely by Environmental Exposure
Friday, December 11, 2009
CWD, FECES, ORAL LESIONS, Aerosol and intranasal transmission
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Detection of protease-resistant cervid prion protein in water from a CWD-endemic area
AS THE CROW FLIES, SO DOES CWD
Sunday, November 01, 2009
American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) and potential spreading of CWD through feces of digested infectious carcases
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
CWD to tighten taxidermy rules Hunters need to understand regulations
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:23 PM
Subject: 14th International Congress on Infectious Diseases H-type and L-type Atypical BSE January 2010 (special pre-congress edition)
18.173 page 189
Experimental Challenge of Cattle with H-type and L-type Atypical BSE
A. Buschmann1, U. Ziegler1, M. Keller1, R. Rogers2, B. Hills3, M.H. Groschup1. 1Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany, 2Health Canada, Bureau of Microbial Hazards, Health Products & Food Branch, Ottawa, Canada, 3Health Canada, Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy Secretariat, Ottawa, Canada
Background: After the detection of two novel BSE forms designated H-type and L-type atypical BSE the question of the pathogenesis and the agent distribution of these two types in cattle was fully open. From initial studies of the brain pathology, it was already known that the anatomical distribution of L-type BSE differs from that of the classical type where the obex region in the brainstem always displays the highest PrPSc concentrations. In contrast in L-type BSE cases, the thalamus and frontal cortex regions showed the highest levels of the pathological prion protein, while the obex region was only weakly involved.
Methods:We performed intracranial inoculations of cattle (five and six per group) using 10%brainstemhomogenates of the two German H- and L-type atypical BSE isolates. The animals were inoculated under narcosis and then kept in a free-ranging stable under appropriate biosafety conditions.At least one animal per group was killed and sectioned in the preclinical stage and the remaining animals were kept until they developed clinical symptoms. The animals were examined for behavioural changes every four weeks throughout the experiment following a protocol that had been established during earlier BSE pathogenesis studies with classical BSE.
Results and Discussion: All animals of both groups developed clinical symptoms and had to be euthanized within 16 months. The clinical picture differed from that of classical BSE, as the earliest signs of illness were loss of body weight and depression. However, the animals later developed hind limb ataxia and hyperesthesia predominantly and the head. Analysis of brain samples from these animals confirmed the BSE infection and the atypical Western blot profile was maintained in all animals. Samples from these animals are now being examined in order to be able to describe the pathogenesis and agent distribution for these novel BSE types. Conclusions: A pilot study using a commercially avaialble BSE rapid test ELISA revealed an essential restriction of PrPSc to the central nervous system for both atypical BSE forms. A much more detailed analysis for PrPSc and infectivity is still ongoing.
From: xxxx
To: Terry Singeltary Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 9:09 AM
Subject: 14th ICID - abstract accepted for 'International Scientific Exchange'
Your preliminary abstract number: 670
Dear Mr. Singeltary,
On behalf of the Scientific Committee, I am pleased to inform you that your abstract
'Transmissible Spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) animal and human TSE in North America update October 2009'
WAS accepted for inclusion in the INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC EXCHANGE (ISE) section of the 14th International Congress on Infectious Diseases. Accordingly, your abstract will be included in the "Intl. Scientific Exchange abstract CD-rom" of the Congress which will be distributed to all participants.
Abstracts accepted for INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC EXCHANGE are NOT PRESENTED in the oral OR poster sessions.
Your abstract below was accepted for: INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC EXCHANGE
#0670: Transmissible Spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) animal and human TSE in North America update October 2009
Author: T. Singeltary; Bacliff, TX/US
Topic: Emerging Infectious Diseases Preferred type of presentation: International Scientific Exchange
This abstract has been ACCEPTED.
#0670: Transmissible Spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) animal and human TSE in North America update October 2009
Authors: T. Singeltary; Bacliff, TX/US
Title: Transmissible Spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) animal and human TSE in North America update October 2009
Body: Background
An update on atypical BSE and other TSE in North America. Please remember, the typical U.K. c-BSE, the atypical l-BSE (BASE), and h-BSE have all been documented in North America, along with the typical scrapie's, and atypical Nor-98 Scrapie, and to date, 2 different strains of CWD, and also TME. All these TSE in different species have been rendered and feed to food producing animals for humans and animals in North America (TSE in cats and dogs ?), and that the trading of these TSEs via animals and products via the USA and Canada has been immense over the years, decades.
Methods
12 years independent research of available data
Results
I propose that the current diagnostic criteria for human TSEs only enhances and helps the spreading of human TSE from the continued belief of the UKBSEnvCJD only theory in 2009. With all the science to date refuting it, to continue to validate this old myth, will only spread this TSE agent through a multitude of potential routes and sources i.e. consumption, medical i.e., surgical, blood, dental, endoscopy, optical, nutritional supplements, cosmetics etc.
Conclusion
I would like to submit a review of past CJD surveillance in the USA, and the urgent need to make all human TSE in the USA a reportable disease, in every state, of every age group, and to make this mandatory immediately without further delay. The ramifications of not doing so will only allow this agent to spread further in the medical, dental, surgical arena's. Restricting the reporting of CJD and or any human TSE is NOT scientific. Iatrogenic CJD knows NO age group, TSE knows no boundaries.
I propose as with Aguzzi, Asante, Collinge, Caughey, Deslys, Dormont, Gibbs, Gajdusek, Ironside, Manuelidis, Marsh, et al and many more, that the world of TSE Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy is far from an exact science, but there is enough proven science to date that this myth should be put to rest once and for all, and that we move forward with a new classification for human and animal TSE that would properly identify the infected species, the source species, and then the route.
Keywords: Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease Prion
see full text ;
Friday, January 29, 2010
14th International Congress on Infectious Diseases H-type and L-type Atypical BSE January 2010 (special pre-congress edition)
*** CJD USA RISING, with UNKNOWN PHENOTYPE ;
5 Includes 41 cases in which the diagnosis is pending, and 17 inconclusive cases; 6 Includes 46 cases with type determination pending in which the diagnosis of vCJD has been excluded.
Saturday, January 2, 2010
Human Prion Diseases in the United States January 1, 2010 ***FINAL***
my comments to PLosone here ;
Terry S. Singeltary Sr. P.O. Box 42 Bacliff, Texas USA 77518
|
RE: SUPPORT HB 4214 - Texas: Relating to the business of taxidermy; providing penalties AND HELP PREVENT CWD
|
June 12, 2011 06:59 PM
[#43]
|
flounder
Points:
Y (1)
/
M (1)
|
|
Forums Statistics:
- There are 19810 registered site users.
- There are currently 17 active users on the site.
- There are currently 1 registered users that active are on the site (and signed in).
- There are currently 8 active users in the Forums.
Welcome to the newest registered users:
ladydeerhunter
bill_spp
dwacker
mjwarren2000
spinnerbaits
animal
shooting
bass
outdoors
target
semihidden
hunting
county
night
rifle
gun
shrimp
wildlife
unhidewhenused
buy
ndash
blue
game
fishing
duck
redfish
ranch
shad
crankbaits
cut
yellow
trout
channel
soft
texas
points
hog
call
camp
family
land
wild
lsdexception
dove
shoot
fish
season
rigs
buck
locked
first
jigs
striped
lease
priority
hunter
turkey
shot
hunt
bait
hunters
bold
bucks
deer
free
south
public
catfish
brush
crappie
hogs
lake
hunts
bow
rsquo
minnows
|