Who is my Texas Senator?
Our Sponsors and Partners:
  • GSC Visitor Engagement Path
  • Google Adsense 120x600
Monthly Points Leaders
  1. brownbuck (200)
  2. bonecollector (200)
  3. scott dye (128)
  4. Strike King (127)
  5. ooj32 (125)
  6. wohalliburton (116)
  7. Hogboy12 (78)
  8. Buckscore (78)
  9. electronicslin... (71)
  10. mdatwo (71)
Yearly Points Leaders
  1. barnharthunter (2495)
  2. boxroutfitters (1132)
  3. scott dye (1071)
  4. SDOPOC (245)
  5. LSmith6749 (225)
  6. rperezjr (222)
  7. tthorp (220)
  8. hornhunter (216)
  9. brownbuck (200)
  10. hillcountryotf... (200)

< Previous Page 81 results found Next Page >

Showing results 11 through 20

Sort your results:

Switch sort direction: ascending

Existing Search Criteria:

Keyword Search remove
rifle
Site Section remove
Forum
User remove
"Jason Parrish"

Refine Your Search:

Search Results:

HOG BAIT/SCENTS/ATTRACTANTS????

Summary:

My experience is those products - and I have used both - really are made to work when you know you have hogs in the immediate area. Their purpose is to congregate the hogs and give them more time under the feeder. If you don't have obvious hog tracks in the immediate area, then you most likely will not have successful hunt by putting it out there and getting in your blind.

However, if you have seen hog markings in the area, then what you want to do is exactly what you did, but give it a couple of days to work. Putting it out on a Friday evening has led to success on Saturday evening and Sunday morning for me in the past.

I have tried jello, fermenting corn in the heat by pouring it into a tub with water and add a little milk to turn it sour faster, big red, and diesel, in terms of the homemade recipes. Again, those hogs are smart. Many times I have had ZERO hogs come in; then I have had a band of 20 come running in. Setting up a wildlife camera to watch your bait all night is very helpful.

When it comes to hogs and big bucks, the wind and your scent is so critical. If this wind is blowing your scent towards where you think the hogs are bedded down during the day, then you have to get in a crosswind position and elevation helps if you have a stand. My best success has been when the wind barely blew during the day, hopefully in their direction, and then I have been fortunate to have the wind change and blow a steady 5mph in my face (away from them). That is the perfect ambush.

Tell us about the different things you try, what part of Texas you are in, are you using a bow, rifle, shotgun, pistol, or other method? It is great to share what doesn't work as much as what does work because it saves us all time and money as Chris said above.

This old forum post has several very effective "baits" for various species. The hogs took this one and ran the first night. There is a photo as the end of the post about the Cherry flavored Hog Scent. CLICK HERE TO READ

Panhandle Hunting

Summary:

As Duckwhacker said, tag, accurate rifle, and I would add...

1. tripod with 50x binoculars so you don't waste time trying to get up on a pronghorn that isn't a suitable trophy.

2. Scout for a couple of days before the hunt, if possible, so you know where the animals are located.

3. If you can't get close enough for a shot, keep on trailing your target animal until dark and then mark on your GPS where you are. Be there before sunrise the next morning and you will most likely see him again. Now you have all day to hunt.

4. Read some of the interesting stories from bowhunters about using a whiteflag. I haven't tried it but I would like to next time I go pronghorn hunting.

URGENT: Critical Funding issues related to TPWD - Voice Your Vote on how YOUR money is spent

URGENT: Critical Funding issues related to TPWD - Voice Your Vote on how YOUR money is spent
Summary:

April 30, 2007

 

The Honorable Warren Chisum

The Honorable Dan Gattis

The Honorable Ryan Guillen

The Honorable Lois Kolkhorst

The Honorable Sylvester Turner

The Honorable Steve Ogden

The Honorable Judith Zaffirini

The Honorable John Whitmire

The Honorable Tommy Williams

The Honorable Robert Duncan

 

Dear House and Senate Budget Conferees:

 

The listed sportsmen’s/conservation-minded organizations represent over 5 million hunters, anglers, conservationists and landowners in Texas.  As you proceed with deliberations regarding the state budget for the next biennium, we strongly encourage you to consider the following:

  • Sportsmen’s/conservation groups want to thank you for continuing to protect Fund 9 dedicated sportsmen’s dollars derived from hunting and fishing licenses and stamps, and provide critical appropriations that lead to spending down the Fund 9 balance over the next 3-4 years.  Federal Aid funds under Pittman-Robertson and Dingell-Johnson totaling more than $26 million dollars a year are at stake.  Sportsmen’s state license dollars and stamps have been dedicated to this 75% federal match from excise taxes on guns, ammunition and fishing equipment since the 1930s.  The loss of federal funds will be devastating to wildlife, fisheries and law enforcement. 
  • Fully fund state parks by fully funding the Texas Parks and Wildlife request for salaries, operating, minor and capital repairs, equipment, land acquisition, and Prop 8 bonds.  Please fund the parks at the Speaker’s requested level of at least $100 million annually for operating, local parks grants, and willing seller land acquisition and development.  We believe the audit results clearly demonstrate that additional funding for salaries – boots on the ground - is critical. We support the department’s commendable commitment to get church youth groups, scouts, minorities, and others in the outdoors by being flexible on costs for groups, especially in our low income and minority communities.  The first outdoor experience for most Texans is in a state park, and sportsmen support full park funding.
  • Keep Rider 27 as per the House version, allowing TPWD to spend revenues in excess of estimates.  Sportsmen agree it is critical to retain Rider 27 in the House language for revenues in excess to be returned for use in sportsmen’s activities and conservation.  It has worked well and needs to remain just like it is today.  Why should sportsmen’s and conservation groups help the department get additional private, federal or NGO grants and funds if it cannot be spent or there is a cap on these expenditures.  Please remove any cap on this rider by adopting the House version.
  • Appropriate the Freshwater Fisheries Stamp Funds for hatcheries.  This stamp fund continues to build beyond expectations and it is critical to fully appropriate the funds directly for hatchery construction, repair and maintenance, saving the sportsmen of Texas millions of dollars in unnecessary spending toward debt service on bonds.  We believe the best option is to adopt the department’s request for $18 million.

 

The listed sportsmen’s/conservation groups want to thank you in advance for listening to our concerns and taking the necessary actions to address them.  This is important for us and for Texas.  Please call Kirby Brown, Chairman of Texas Outdoor Partners at 210/826-2904 if you need additional information.

 

Sincerely,    

 

Anglers Club of San Antonio

Audubon Texas

Austin Woods and Waters Club

Coastal Bend Bays and Estuaries Program

Coastal Conservation Association Texas

Dallas Safari Club

Ducks Unlimited

Exotic Wildlife Association

Gulf Coast Chapter, Safari Club International

Houston Safari Club

LBJ Fish and Habitat Project

Lone Star Bowhunters Association

North Texas Chapter, Safari Club International

Plateau Land and Wildlife

Pheasants Forever

Quail Forever

Quail Unlimited

Quality Deer Management Association

Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation

Safari Club International, Austin Chapter

Saltwater-fisheries Enhancement Association

SCIF Austin Sables

Texas Association of Bass Clubs

Texas BASS Federation Nation

Texas Bighorn Society

Texas Black Bass Unlimited

Texas Brigades

Texas Chapter, National Wild Turkey Federation

Texas Chapter of The Wildlife Society

Texas Dog Hunters Association

Texas Deer Association

Texas Gulf Coast Stewards

TexasHuntFish.Com

Texas Mining and Reclamation Association 

Texas Organization of Wildlife Management Associations

Texas Outdoor Council

Texas Recreational Fishing Alliance

Texas Sportsman’s Association

Texas State Rifle Association

Texas Teaming with Wildlife Coalition

Texas Taxidermy Association, Inc.

Texas Wildlife Association 

The Nature Conservancy of Texas

 

cc:        The Honorable Tom Craddick, Speaker

            The Honorable David Dewhurst, Lt. Governor

Shotgun Pattern Test at 40 yards with Benelli M4, Benelli Nova, and Winchester 1200

Summary: I read a post on the forum and it talked about taking the time to pattern your shotgun with different loads and different chokes, just like you would try different loads in a rifle to pick the one that best groups, and then sight in your rifle. I decided to test my grandfather's Winchester 1200 (F...

Do you know the difference between a choke that says "M" or "***" or has 3 notches on the end?

Summary: Shotguns A beginner's guide to shotgun chokes - by John Robinson While taken for granted today, the choking of shotgun barrels was the greatest advance on shotgun performance since the invention of the smoothbore firearm. In the muzzleloading era, the main aim was to shove whatever was neede...

30-06 VS .270

Summary:

I have been looking to buy a new, light weight rifle I can carry while hiking with all my equipment (video camera, still camera, binoculars, range finder, blah blah). I just read this article and logged on to share it with everyone when I saw this post. I guess a lot of us are thinking about the same issue.

This is the best bottom line comparison of the .270 vs. .30-06 I have found.

A Perfect Pair (.270 Win. and .30-06)

By Chuck Hawks

Okay, I admit, its been fun debating the relative superiority of the .270 Winchester and the .30-06 Springfield since the .270 first challenged the .30-06 back in 1925. That long running controversy has helped to propel these two cartridges to the top of the charts. (There is no such thing as bad publicity, right?) The .30-30 may be the best selling big game cartridge of all time, but the .30-06 is the best selling big game cartridge for bolt action rifles, and the .270 Winchester is number two.

Both can trace their roots back to the obsolete .30-03. The .30-06 is based on a slightly shortened version of that case, and the .270 is based on a necked-down .30-06 case. The shoulder angle is identical and so is the powder capacity to the base of the shoulder. Both require a long, but not magnum length, rifle action.

.30-06 Spfd.
.30-06 Springfield. Illustration courtesy of Hornady Mfg. Co.

The .30-06 became famous as a military cartridge shooting a 150 grain spitzer bullet (BC .226), and that is still a very popular bullet weight with hunters, particularly those seeking CXP2 game. (In North America that would primarily include deer, black bear, caribou, antelope, sheep, goats, and feral hogs.) The 150 grain bullet was introduced in the .30-06 at a MV of 2700 fps, but improvements in powder technology have increased that to about 2900 fps in most factory loads today. However, the load that made the .30-06's reputation with hunters as an all-around big game hunting cartridge--meaning all of the above CXP2 game plus elk, moose, and grizzly bear--is the 180 grain bullet (BC .271) at a MV of about 2700 fps.

.270 Win.
.270 Winchester. Illustration courtesy of Hornady Mfg. Co.

The .270 Winchester is purely a hunting cartridge with no military background. Winchester introduced it with a 130 grain bullet (BC .242) at a MV of about 3140 fps, and at the time it was the flattest shooting commercial big game cartridge in the world. And it is still the long range hunting cartridge to which all others are compared. When properly placed that high velocity 130 grain bullet kills CXP2 game like lighting. And it has also accounted for more CXP3 game than seems reasonable. But for those who wanted a heavier projectile for use on elk and moose, a 150 grain bullet (BC .279) at a MV of 2900 fps is offered.

So now both the .270 and .30-06 can handle all CXP2 and CXP3 game, at normal or long ranges, by changing bullet weights. Thus either caliber is suitable for the one rifle big game hunter.

Unfortunately, the reality is that it is a hassle, not to mention expensive in the long run, to keep changing bullet weights. That normally requires re-zeroing the rifle, which means a special trip to the rifle range. The result is that most hunters don't bother to re-zero, and in the end just stick with one bullet weight. Often that becomes a compromise weight, such as 140 grains (BC .261) in .270 and 165 grains (BC .248) in .30-06. But, these compromise bullets are not ideal for CXP2 or CXP3 game; they're merely passable for both.

The fact remains that the .270/130 superior to the .30-06/150 as a long range and CXP2 game load. Conversely, the .30-06/180 is superior to the .270/150 as a CXP3 game load. You'd have to be a dyed in the wool .270 or .30-06 true believer to dispute the reality of those statements, and the majority of experienced hunters would agree with me. The late, great Jack O'Connor once wrote (to paraphrase) that if all .270 loads but the 130 grain and all .30-06 loads but the 180 grain were to be discontinued, we would not be greatly inconvenienced. I am inclined to agree with him, since I have habitually zeroed my .270 rifles for 130 grain bullets and my .30-06 with 180 grain bullets.

So my suggestion is to forget the "one rifle" idea altogether and spring for two rifles. Consider purchasing a .270 and a .30-06. Use the .270/130 grain load for long range shooting and hunting CXP2 game, and the .30-06/180 grain load in the woods and for hunting CXP3 game. No more compromise bullet weights and no more having to re-zero your rifle.

And the nice thing is that you need to take two rifles on any important hunt, anyway, just in case one malfunctions. With these two, they can substitute for each other in a pinch. Sure, you'd prefer to shoot your elk with the .30-06/180, but if it's out of commission for some reason the .270/130 has a long track record as an elk slayer. Conversely, if your .270 is out of action the .30-06/180 load shoots flat enough to cover the majority of shots. And, while it kicks a little harder and might not kill deer quite as fast at long range as the .270/130, there is no question that it can do the job. The two calibers and loads complement each other. Gee, a perfect pair!


Copyright 2007 by Chuck Hawks. All rights reserved.

MOST SWEEPING GUN BAN EVER INTRODUCED IN CONGRESS

Summary:        NRA-ILA Grassroots Alert Vol. 14, No. 8 02/23/07 States with updates this issue:  Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada,  New Me...

Barrett Optical Ranging System (BORS)

Barrett Optical Ranging System (BORS)
Summary: The BORS is an exciting new development in long range shooting. It is an integrated electronic ballistic computer that couples directly to the rifle telescope by acting as the upper rear scope ring. The BORS continuously measures air temperature, barometric pressure, and bore line angle. Given the...

NOT a Golden Eagle in West Texas, near Marathon on the Stovall Ranch

NOT a Golden Eagle in West Texas, near Marathon on the Stovall Ranch
Summary: I took this video during a Mule Deer hunt this winter with Keith Oliver from   aknockoutguide.com. We saw a nice mature buck the first morning, walked up within 50 yards of a black bear (by accident and I was too scared to lower my rifle and take a photo), and then this nice Eagle.

Big Caliber Pistols (.308, 30-06, .270)

Big Caliber Pistols (.308, 30-06, .270)
Summary: Do any of you know much about the ballistics of these types of rounds and how they differ when shot from a pistol instead of a rifle? The T/C’s Encore® Hunter’s Package looks like a great gun that would really be a challenge. Opinions?

< Previous Page 81 results found Next Page >

Showing results 11 through 20